Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28342267›Full record

ReviewProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2017

The chaperone toolbox at the single-molecule level: From clamping to confining.

Mario J Avellaneda, Eline J Koers, Mohsin M Naqvi, Sander J Tans

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Protein Nanomechanics.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Picturing protein disaggregation.Nature chemical biology · 2022
    Article
  7. Chaperonin Abundance Enhances Bacterial Fitness.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Folding while bound to chaperones.Current opinion in structural biology · 2018
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Folding of maltose binding protein outside of and in GroEL.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mario J AvellanedaAMOLF institute, Science Park 104, 1098XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eline J KoersAMOLF institute, Science Park 104, 1098XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mohsin M NaqviAMOLF institute, Science Park 104, 1098XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sander J TansAMOLF institute, Science Park 104, 1098XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein folding is well known to be supervised by a dedicated class of proteins called chaperones. However, the core mode of action of these molecular machines has remained elusive due to several reasons including the promiscuous nature of the interactions between chaperones and their many clients, as well as the dynamics and heterogeneity of chaperone conformations and the folding process itself. While troublesome for traditional bulk techniques, these properties make an excellent case for the use of single-molecule approaches. In this review, we will discuss how force spectroscopy, fluorescence microscopy, FCS, and FRET methods are starting to zoom in on this intriguing and diverse molecular toolbox that is of direct importance for protein quality control in cells, as well as numerous degenerative conditions that depend on it.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingAnimalsFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferHumansMicroscopy, FluorescenceMolecular ChaperonesMolecular ChaperoneschaperonesGroELHsp70Hsp90molecular machinessingle-moleculetrigger factor

Identifiers

PMID28342267
PMCPMC5477537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.