Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28342121›Full record

Trial reportJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2017

Can Comprehensive Imaging Analysis with Analytic Morphomics and Geriatric Assessment Predict Serious Complications in Patients Undergoing Pancreatic Surgery?

Andrew J Benjamin, Mary M Buschmann, Andrew Schneider, Brian A Derstine, Jeffrey F Friedman, Stewart C Wang, William Dale, Kevin K Roggin

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Anthropometric Changes in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Preoperative Therapy and Pancreatoduodenectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew J BenjaminDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Mary M BuschmannDepartment of Medicine, Section of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Andrew SchneiderDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Brian A DerstineMorphomic Analysis Group, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jeffrey F FriedmanMorphomic Analysis Group, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Stewart C WangMorphomic Analysis Group, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
William DaleDepartment of Medicine, Section of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Kevin K RogginDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. kroggin@surgery.bsd.uchicago.edu.
University of Chicago · USMorpho (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to determine whether comprehensive imaging analysis with analytic morphomics (AM) enhances or replaces geriatric assessment (GA) in risk-stratifying pancreatic surgery patients. One hundred thirty-four pancreatic surgery patients were identified from a prospective cohort. Sixty-three patients in the cohort had preoperative CT scans in addition to comprehensive geriatric assessments. CT scans were processed using AM. Associations with National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) serious complications were evaluated using univariate analysis and robust elastic net modeling to obtain AUROC curves by adding AM and GA measures to our previously defined clinical base risk model (age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, and Charlson comorbidity index). NSQIP serious complications were associated with low psoas Hounsfield units (HUs) (p = 0.002), low-density (0 to 30 HU) psoas area (p = 0.01), visceral fat HU (p ≤ 0.001), visceral fat area (p = 0.009), subcutaneous fat HU (p = 0.023), and total body area (p = 0.012) on univariate analysis. Elastic net models incorporating the base model with geriatric assessment and psoas HU (AUC = 0.751), and AM alone (AUC = 0.739) have greater predictive value than the base model alone (AUC = 0.601). The model utilizing AM and GA in combination had the highest predictive value (AUC = 0.841). When combined, AM and GA improve prediction of NSQIP serious complications compared to either technique alone. The additive nature of these two modalities suggests they likely capture unique aspects of a patient's fitness for surgery.

Indexed as

Body CompositionGeriatric AssessmentPancreatectomyPancreaticoduodenectomyTomography, X-Ray ComputedWhole Body ImagingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePostoperative ComplicationsAnalytic morphomicsGeriatric assessmentPancreatic cancerSarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID28342121
OpenAlexW2600948801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.