Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28342064›Full record

ReviewClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2017

HDL cholesterol: reappraisal of its clinical relevance.

Winfried März, Marcus E Kleber, Hubert Scharnagl, Timotheus Speer, Stephen Zewinger, Andreas Ritsch, Klaus G Parhofer, Arnold von Eckardstein, Ulf Landmesser, Ulrich Laufs

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 122 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
122citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
17.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

122 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 287 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. The HDL lipidome is widely remodeled by fast food versus Mediterranean diet in 4 days.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2019
    Trial
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A practical guide to the management of dyslipidaemia.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Winfried MärzMedizinische Klinik V (Nephrologie, Hypertensiologie, Rheumatologie, Endokrinologie, Diabetelogie), Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Marcus E KleberMedizinische Klinik V (Nephrologie, Hypertensiologie, Rheumatologie, Endokrinologie, Diabetelogie), Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hubert ScharnaglKlinisches Institut für Medizinische und Chemische Labordiagnostik, Medizinische Universität Graz, Graz, Austria.
Timotheus SpeerKlinik für Innere Medizin IV, Nieren- und Hochdruckkrankheiten, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, 66421, Homburg, Saarland, Germany.
Stephen ZewingerKlinik für Innere Medizin IV, Nieren- und Hochdruckkrankheiten, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, 66421, Homburg, Saarland, Germany.
Andreas RitschKlinik für Innere Medizin, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Klaus G ParhoferMedizinische Klinik II, Klinikum der Universität München, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Arnold von EckardsteinInstitut für Klinische Chemie, Universitäts Spital, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ulf LandmesserKlinik für Kardiologie, Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Ulrich LaufsKlinik für Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, IMED, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, 66421, Homburg, Saarland, Germany. ulrich.laufs@uks.eu.
Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEFriedrich Schiller University Jena · DEInnsbruck Medical University · ATLMU Klinikum · DEMedizinische Fakultät MannheimSee-Spital · CHUniversity of Graz · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile several lines of evidence prove that elevated concentrations of low-density lipoproteins (LDL) causally contribute to the development of atherosclerosis and its clinical consequences, high-density lipoproteins are still widely believed to exert atheroprotective effects. Hence, HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) is in general still considered as "good cholesterol". Recent research, however, suggests that this might not always be the case and that a fundamental reassessment of the clinical significance of HDL-C is warranted.

methodThis review article is based on a selective literature review.

resultsIn individuals without a history of cardiovascular events, low concentrations of HDL-C are inversely associated with the risk of future cardiovascular events. This relationship may, however, not apply to patients with metabolic disorders or manifest cardiovascular disease. The classical function of HDL is to mobilise cholesterol from extrahepatic tissues for delivery to the liver for excretion. These roles in cholesterol metabolism as well as many other biological functions of HDL particles are dependent on the number as well as protein and lipid composition of HDL particles. They are poorly reflected by the HDL-C concentration. HDL can even exert negative vascular effects, if its composition is pathologically altered. High serum HDL-C is therefore no longer regarded protective. In line with this, recent pharmacological approaches to raise HDL-C concentration have not been able to show reductions of cardiovascular outcomes.

conclusionIn contrast to LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), HDL-C correlates with cardiovascular risk only in healthy individuals. The calculation of the ratio of LDL-C to HDL-C is not useful for all patients. Low HDL-C should prompt examination of additional metabolic and inflammatory pathologies. An increase in HDL-C through lifestyle change (smoking cessation, physical exercise) has positive effects and is recommended. However, HDL-C is currently not a valid target for drug therapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsAtherosclerosisCardiovascular DiseasesCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLHumansRisk FactorsCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLCholesterolHDLReview

Identifiers

PMID28342064
PMCPMC5565659
OpenAlexW2599772444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.