Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28341980›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2017

Implementation and evaluation of a paediatric nurse-driven sedation protocol in a paediatric intensive care unit.

Lélia Dreyfus, Etienne Javouhey, Angélique Denis, Sandrine Touzet, Fabienne Bordet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lélia DreyfusService de réanimation pédiatrique, Hospices Civils de Lyon - Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, 59, Boulevard Pinel, 69500, Bron, France. lelia.dreyfus@gmail.com.
Etienne JavouheyService de réanimation pédiatrique, Hospices Civils de Lyon - Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, 59, Boulevard Pinel, 69500, Bron, France.
Angélique DenisPôle information médicale évaluation recherche, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 162 avenue Lacassagne Bâtiment A, 69003, Lyon, France.
Sandrine TouzetPôle information médicale évaluation recherche, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 162 avenue Lacassagne Bâtiment A, 69003, Lyon, France.
Fabienne BordetService de réanimation pédiatrique, Hospices Civils de Lyon - Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, 59, Boulevard Pinel, 69500, Bron, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptimal sedation and analgesia is a challenge in paediatric intensive care units (PICU) because of difficulties in scoring systems and specific metabolism inducing tolerance and withdrawal. Excessive sedation is associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation and hospitalisation. Adult and paediatric data suggest that goal-directed sedation algorithms reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation. We implemented a nurse-driven sedation protocol in a PICU and evaluated its impact.

methodsWe conducted a before and after protocol implementation study in a population of children aged 0-18 years who required mechanical ventilation for at least 24 h between January 2013 and March 2015. After the protocol implementation in January 2014, nurses managed analgesia and sedation following an algorithm that included the COMFORT behaviour scale (COMFORT-B). Duration of mechanical ventilation was the primary outcome; secondary outcomes were total doses and duration of medications, PICU length of stay, incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia, and occurrence of withdrawal symptoms. Pre-post analysis followed with segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series was used to assess the effect of protocol.

resultsA total of 200 children were analysed, including 107 before implementation and 93 children after implementation of the protocol. After implementation of the protocol, the total number of COMFORT-B scores per day of mechanical ventilation significantly increased from 3.9 ± 2.5 times during the pre-implementation period to 6.6 ± 3.5 times during the post-implementation period (p < 10

conclusionsThese results were promising and suggested that implementation of a nurse-driven sedation protocol in a PICU was feasible. Evaluation of sedation and analgesia was better after the protocol implementation; duration of mechanical ventilation and occurrence of withdrawal symptoms tended to be reduced.

Indexed as

BenzodiazepineCOMFORT-B scoreEvaluationFeasibilityMechanical ventilationNurse-driven sedation protocolOpioidPICUWithdrawal symptoms

Identifiers

PMID28341980
PMCPMC5366991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.