Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28341927›Full record

ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2017

Optimal Network for Patients with Severe Mental Illness: A Social Network Analysis.

Vincent Lorant, James Nazroo, Pablo Nicaise, Title107 Study Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vincent LorantInstitute of Health and Society, Université Catholique de Louvain, Clos chapelle aux champs 30.15/05, 1200, Bruxelles, Belgium. vincent.lorant@uclouvain.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2663-332X
James NazrooCathie Marsh Institute for Social Research, University of Manchester, Humanities Bridgeford Street Building, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Pablo NicaiseInstitute of Health and Society, Université Catholique de Louvain, Clos chapelle aux champs 30.15/05, 1200, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Title107 Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is still unclear what the optimal structure of mental health care networks should be. We examine whether certain types of network structure have been associated with improved continuity of care and greater social integration. A social network survey was carried out, covering 954 patients across 19 mental health networks in Belgium in 2014. We found continuity of care to be associated with large, centralized, and homophilous networks, whereas social integration was associated with smaller, centralized, and heterophilous networks. Two important goals of mental health service provision, continuity of care and social integration, are associated with different types of network. Further research is needed to ascertain the direction of this association.

Indexed as

Community IntegrationAdultBelgiumContinuity of Patient CareFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedSeverity of Illness IndexSocial SupportSocial WorkOptimal structurePatients with psychiatric disordersReferral network

Identifiers

PMID28341927
PMCPMC5640746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.