Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28341918›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of hematology2017

Dasatinib versus imatinib in Japanese patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia: a subanalysis of the DASISION 5-year final report.

Hirohisa Nakamae, Shin Fujisawa, Michinori Ogura, Toshiki Uchida, Yasushi Onishi, Masafumi Taniwaki, Atae Utsunomiya, Kosei Matsue, Yasushi Takamatsu, Kensuke Usuki and 5 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of hematology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. [Advances in basic and clinical research of flumatinib].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Hirohisa NakamaeDepartment of Hematology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan. hirohisa@msic.med.osaka-cu.ac.jp.
Shin FujisawaDepartment of Hematology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Michinori OguraDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Toshiki UchidaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Yasushi OnishiDepartment of Hematology and Rheumatology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Masafumi TaniwakiDepartment of Hematology, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Atae UtsunomiyaDepartment of Hematology, Imamura Bun-in Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan.
Kosei MatsueDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan.
Yasushi TakamatsuDivision of Medical Oncology, Hematology and Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Fukuoka University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kensuke UsukiDepartment of Hematology, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Mitsune TanimotoDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Yoji IshidaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Internal Medicine, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Morioka, Japan.
Kazuteru OhashiCancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Li LiBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Masafumi MiyoshiBristol-Myers Squibb, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The international phase III DASISION trial demonstrated improved efficacy of dasatinib versus imatinib in treatment-naive patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase (CML-CP). We report efficacy and safety outcomes in a Japanese population from the final, 5-year follow-up of DASISION. At the end of the study, 77% (20/26) of dasatinib-treated and 61% (14/23) of imatinib-treated patients remained on initial therapy. Improved responses were observed in Japanese patients who received dasatinib versus imatinib (complete cytogenetic response: 96 vs 87%; major molecular response: 88 vs 74%; BCR-ABL1 ≤0.0032% International Scale [MR

Indexed as

AdultAgedAsian PeopleDasatinibDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImatinib MesylateJapanLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveMaleMiddle AgedSurvival RateDasatinibImatinib MesylateCMLDasatinibImatinibJapanTyrosine kinase inhibitor

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.