Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28341916›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2017

Long-Term Results Following Antibiotic Treatment of Acute Appendicitis in Adults.

K Lundholm, J Hansson-Assarsson, C Engström, B-M Iresjö

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Chronic appendicitis: two case reports.Journal of medical case reports · 2022
    Article
  7. Where have all the appendicectomies gone?Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2021
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Clinical Management of Appendicitis.Visceral medicine · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

K LundholmSurgical Metabolic Research Lab, Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital and The Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Vita Stråket 12, plan 2, 413 45, Göteborg, Sweden. kent.lundholm@surgery.gu.se.
J Hansson-AssarssonDepartment of Surgery, Kalmar County Hospital, Kalmar, Sweden.
C EngströmSurgical Metabolic Research Lab, Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital and The Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Vita Stråket 12, plan 2, 413 45, Göteborg, Sweden.
B-M IresjöSurgical Metabolic Research Lab, Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital and The Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Vita Stråket 12, plan 2, 413 45, Göteborg, Sweden.
Sahlgrenska University Hospital · SELandstinget i Kalmar län · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibiotic treatment of acute appendicitis has gained interest and inquiries. Reports have demonstrated both safety and high resolution of symptoms and inflammation following antibiotic treatment of appendicitis, but information on long-term results is required. Our present aim was therefore to evaluate long-term recurrence rate of initial antibiotics-alone treatment for suspected acute appendicitis.

methodsPatients with favourable response to antibiotics in earlier randomized (RCT, n = 97) and population-based (PBT, n = 342) studies as well as subsequently treated non-randomized (Non-R, n = 271) patients are evaluated for long-term risk to relapse demanding surgical appendectomy; altogether 710 patients.

resultsClinical characteristics among randomized and non-randomized patients were similar without any statistical difference according to abdominal symptoms and degree of systemic inflammation (CRP, WCC) when antibiotic treatment started. Females and males showed the same results. The median follow-up time was 2162 days (5.92 years), and the range across highest and lowest follow-up was 3495 days (range 2-3497) for the entire group, without significant differences among subgroups (RCT, PBT, Non-R). The cumulative probability for relapse of appendicitis demanding appendectomy was: 0.09, 0.12, 0.12 and 0.13 at 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year follow-up, with a probability of 0.86 ± 0.013 without appendectomy after 8 years. This may imply an overall benefit of 60-70% by antibiotics during expected 10-year follow-up accounting for initial treatment failures at 10-23% in our published reports.

conclusionAntibiotic treatment is safe and effective as a first-line therapy in unselected adults with acute appendicitis with a risk around 15% for long-term relapse following favourable initial treatment response.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsAppendectomyAppendicitisFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrenceTime FactorsTreatment FailureAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID28341916
PMCPMC5544800
OpenAlexW2603298641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.