Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28341897›Full record

ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2017

Researcher readiness for participating in community-engaged dissemination and implementation research: a conceptual framework of core competencies.

Christopher M Shea, Tiffany L Young, Byron J Powell, Catherine Rohweder, Zoe K Enga, Jennifer E Scott, Lori Carter-Edwards, Giselle Corbie-Smith

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. "… Work Really Is Being Done and It's Very Worthwhile …": Reflections from Community Advisory Board Members.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher M SheaNorth Carolina Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (NC TraCS), Chapel Hill, NC, USA. chris_shea@unc.edu.
Tiffany L YoungNorth Carolina Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (NC TraCS), Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Byron J PowellNorth Carolina Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (NC TraCS), Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Catherine RohwederNorth Carolina Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (NC TraCS), Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Zoe K EngaNorth Carolina Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (NC TraCS), Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Jennifer E ScottNorth Carolina Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (NC TraCS), Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Lori Carter-EdwardsNorth Carolina Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (NC TraCS), Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Giselle Corbie-SmithNorth Carolina Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (NC TraCS), Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
University of North Carolina Health Care · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Virology, Immunology, and Microbiology CoreP30AI050410 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVID M. MARGOLIS · 2001 to 2026
$76.9M
Re-Entry Supplement: Investigation of Oral Microbial Enzymes for the Detection and Treatment of Periodontal DiseaseUL1TR002489 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, SHAHEEN, NICHOLAS J · 2018 to 2022
$48.6M
North Carolina Translational & Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS)UL1TR001111 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, CAREY, TIMOTHY S · 2013 to 2017
$43.9M
IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES IRI-MHSR25MH080916 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Byron James Powell · 2009 to 2026
$3.7M
Mentoring in community influences on CVD riskK24HL105493 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CORBIE, GISELLE · 2010 to 2019
$1.5M
Advancing Implementation Science through Measure Development and EvaluationR01MH106510 · NIMH · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI LEWIS, CARA CHARISSA · 2015 to 2017
$1.3M
IMPROVING THE IMPLEMENTATION AND SUSTAINMENT OF EBPS IN MENTAL HEALTH: DEVELOPING AND PILOTING THE COLLABORATIVE ORGANIZATIONAL APPROACH TO SELECTING AND TAILORING IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES (COAST-ISK01MH113806 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI POWELL, BYRON JAMES · 2017 to 2020
$697k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001111NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002489NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL105493NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050410NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH113806NIMH NIH HHS L30 MH108060NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106510NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH080916
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Participating in community-engaged dissemination and implementation (CEDI) research is challenging for a variety of reasons. Currently, there is not specific guidance or a tool available for researchers to assess their readiness to conduct CEDI research. We propose a conceptual framework that identifies detailed competencies for researchers participating in CEDI and maps these competencies to domains. The framework is a necessary step toward developing a CEDI research readiness survey that measures a researcher's attitudes, willingness, and self-reported ability for acquiring the knowledge and performing the behaviors necessary for effective community engagement. The conceptual framework for CEDI competencies was developed by a team of eight faculty and staff affiliated with a university's Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA). The authors developed CEDI competencies by identifying the attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors necessary for carrying out commonly accepted CE principles. After collectively developing an initial list of competencies, team members individually mapped each competency to a single domain that provided the best fit. Following the individual mapping, the group held two sessions in which the sorting preferences were shared and discrepancies were discussed until consensus was reached. During this discussion, modifications to wording of competencies and domains were made as needed. The team then engaged five community stakeholders to review and modify the competencies and domains. The CEDI framework consists of 40 competencies organized into nine domains: perceived value of CE in D&I research, introspection and openness, knowledge of community characteristics, appreciation for stakeholder's experience with and attitudes toward research, preparing the partnership for collaborative decision-making, collaborative planning for the research design and goals, communication effectiveness, equitable distribution of resources and credit, and sustaining the partnership. Delineation of CEDI competencies advances the broader CE principles and D&I research goals found in the literature and facilitates development of readiness assessments tied to specific training resources for researchers interested in conducting CEDI research.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationInformation DisseminationTranslational Research, BiomedicalAttitudeBehaviorHealth Plan ImplementationHumansModels, PsychologicalResearch PersonnelSelf ReportCommunity engagementDissemination and implementationEducation and trainingImplementation scienceStakeholder engagement

Identifiers

PMID28341897
PMCPMC5645278
OpenAlexW2597478154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.