ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2017
Researcher readiness for participating in community-engaged dissemination and implementation research: a conceptual framework of core competencies.
Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Initial organizational practices and contextual factors related to brain injury screening and referral in intimate partner violence serving community- based organizations.Research square · 2026Article
- Exploring Stakeholder Involvement in Intervention Implementation Studies: Systematic Evidence Synthesis With an Evidence Gap Map Approach.Evaluation & the health professions · 2026Review
- Article
- Centering communities in policy implementation research: considerations for the integration of community-based participatory research principles into policy-focused implementation science.Translational behavioral medicine · 2026Article
- The Integrated Knowledge, Dissemination, and Action Framework: A Model for Community-Engaged Translation, Dissemination, and Action.Health promotion practice · 2025Article
- A mapping review and critique of the literature on translation, dissemination, and implementation capacity building initiatives for different audiences.Implementation science communications · 2025Review
- Characteristics of mandates for evidence-based behavioral health interventions in 8 selected US states.Evaluation and program planning · 2025Article
- Recommendations for interdisciplinary research collaboration for early career dissemination and implementation researchers: A multi-phase study.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- "… Work Really Is Being Done and It's Very Worthwhile …": Reflections from Community Advisory Board Members.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2025Article
- Using Participatory Implementation Science to Advance Health Equity.Annual review of public health · 2024Review
- Community Engagement Strategies for Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Populations.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2024Review
- Team science competencies across the career life course for translational science teams.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Mixed methods evaluation of the inaugural year of the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network's (CPCRN) scholars program.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2023Article
- Identifying research practices toward achieving health equity principles within the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2023Article
- Integrating participants as partners in research governance and operations: an approach from theBMJ open · 2023Review
- A scoping review of implementation science theories, models, and frameworks - an appraisal of purpose, characteristics, usability, applicability, and testability.Implementation science : IS · 2023Article
- Community and partner engagement in dissemination and implementation research at the National Institutes of Health: an analysis of recently funded studies and opportunities to advance the field.Implementation science communications · 2023Article
- Considerations When Designing and Implementing Pragmatic Clinical Trials That Include Older Hispanics.Ethnicity & disease · 2023Article
- Evidence-Based Quality Improvement (EBQI) in the pre-implementation phase: key steps and activities.Frontiers in health services · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Participating in community-engaged dissemination and implementation (CEDI) research is challenging for a variety of reasons. Currently, there is not specific guidance or a tool available for researchers to assess their readiness to conduct CEDI research. We propose a conceptual framework that identifies detailed competencies for researchers participating in CEDI and maps these competencies to domains. The framework is a necessary step toward developing a CEDI research readiness survey that measures a researcher's attitudes, willingness, and self-reported ability for acquiring the knowledge and performing the behaviors necessary for effective community engagement. The conceptual framework for CEDI competencies was developed by a team of eight faculty and staff affiliated with a university's Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA). The authors developed CEDI competencies by identifying the attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors necessary for carrying out commonly accepted CE principles. After collectively developing an initial list of competencies, team members individually mapped each competency to a single domain that provided the best fit. Following the individual mapping, the group held two sessions in which the sorting preferences were shared and discrepancies were discussed until consensus was reached. During this discussion, modifications to wording of competencies and domains were made as needed. The team then engaged five community stakeholders to review and modify the competencies and domains. The CEDI framework consists of 40 competencies organized into nine domains: perceived value of CE in D&I research, introspection and openness, knowledge of community characteristics, appreciation for stakeholder's experience with and attitudes toward research, preparing the partnership for collaborative decision-making, collaborative planning for the research design and goals, communication effectiveness, equitable distribution of resources and credit, and sustaining the partnership. Delineation of CEDI competencies advances the broader CE principles and D&I research goals found in the literature and facilitates development of readiness assessments tied to specific training resources for researchers interested in conducting CEDI research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.