ArticleScientific reports2017
The feature-specific propagation of orientation and direction adaptation from areas 17 to 21a in cats.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ocular Dominance Plasticity of Areas 17 and 21a in the Cat.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adaptation plays a key role in visual information processing, and investigations on the adaptation across different visual regions will be helpful to understand how information is processed dynamically along the visual streams. Recent studies have found the enhanced adaptation effects in the early visual system (from LGN to V1) and the dorsal stream (from V1 to MT). However, it remains unclear how adaptation effect propagates along the form/orientation stream in the visual system. In this study, we compared the orientation and direction adaptation evoked by drifting gratings and stationary flashing gratings, as well as moving random dots, in areas 17 and 21a simultaneously of cats. Recorded by single-unit and intrinsic signal optical imaging, induced by both top-up and biased adaptation protocols, the orientation adaptation effect was greater in response decline and preferred orientation shifts in area 21a compared to area 17. However, for the direction adaptation, no difference was observed between these two areas. These results suggest the feature-specific propagation of the adaptation effect along the visual stream.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.