Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28341771›Full record

ArticleGenome research2017

Small chromosomal regions position themselves autonomously according to their chromatin class.

Harmen J G van de Werken, Josien C Haan, Yana Feodorova, Dominika Bijos, An Weuts, Koen Theunis, Sjoerd J B Holwerda, Wouter Meuleman, Ludo Pagie, Katharina Thanisch and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. CENP-A and centromere evolution in equids.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Molecular Dynamics and Evolution of Centromeres in the Genus Equus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Computational methods for analyzing and modeling genome structure and organization.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2019
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Harmen J G van de WerkenCancer Computational Biology Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute & Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9794-1477
Josien C HaanLaboratory of Reproductive Genomics, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Yana FeodorovaDepartment of Biology II, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Dominika BijosDivision of Gene Regulation, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
An WeutsLaboratory of Reproductive Genomics, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Koen TheunisLaboratory of Reproductive Genomics, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Sjoerd J B HolwerdaHubrecht Institute-KNAW & University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Wouter MeulemanDivision of Gene Regulation, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1196-5401
Ludo PagieDivision of Gene Regulation, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Katharina ThanischDepartment of Biology II, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Parveen KumarLaboratory of Reproductive Genomics, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Heinrich LeonhardtDepartment of Biology II, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Peter MarynenHuman Genome Laboratory, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Bas van SteenselDivision of Gene Regulation, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Thierry VoetLaboratory of Reproductive Genomics, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Wouter de LaatHubrecht Institute-KNAW & University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Irina SoloveiDepartment of Biology II, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Boris JoffeDepartment of Biology II, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.

Funding

European Research Council 293662
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spatial arrangement of chromatin is linked to the regulation of nuclear processes. One striking aspect of nuclear organization is the spatial segregation of heterochromatic and euchromatic domains. The mechanisms of this chromatin segregation are still poorly understood. In this work, we investigated the link between the primary genomic sequence and chromatin domains. We analyzed the spatial intranuclear arrangement of a human artificial chromosome (HAC) in a xenospecific mouse background in comparison to an orthologous region of native mouse chromosome. The two orthologous regions include segments that can be assigned to three major chromatin classes according to their gene abundance and repeat repertoire: (1) gene-rich and SINE-rich euchromatin; (2) gene-poor and LINE/LTR-rich heterochromatin; and (3) gene-depleted and satellite DNA-containing constitutive heterochromatin. We show, using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and 4C-seq technologies, that chromatin segments ranging from 0.6 to 3 Mb cluster with segments of the same chromatin class. As a consequence, the chromatin segments acquire corresponding positions in the nucleus irrespective of their chromosomal context, thereby strongly suggesting that this is their autonomous property. Interactions with the nuclear lamina, although largely retained in the HAC, reveal less autonomy. Taken together, our results suggest that building of a functional nucleus is largely a self-organizing process based on mutual recognition of chromosome segments belonging to the major chromatin classes.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TransformedCell NucleusChromosomes, Artificial, HumanEuchromatinFibroblastsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHeterochromatinHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMicePrimary Cell CultureRetinaEuchromatinHeterochromatin

Identifiers

PMID28341771
PMCPMC5453326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.