Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28341759›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2017

A Phase Ib Study of Sorafenib (BAY 43-9006) in Patients with Kaposi Sarcoma.

Thomas S Uldrick, Priscila H Gonçalves, Kathleen M Wyvill, Cody J Peer, Wendy Bernstein, Karen Aleman, Mark N Polizzotto, David Venzon, Seth M Steinberg, Vickie Marshall and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Genetic landscape of indolent and aggressive Kaposi sarcomas.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Oncologic Treatment of HIV-Associated Kaposi Sarcoma 40 Years on.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Viral Oncology: Molecular Biology and Pathogenesis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas S UldrickHIV and AIDS Malignancy Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA uldrickts@mail.nih.gov.
Priscila H GonçalvesHIV and AIDS Malignancy Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Kathleen M WyvillHIV and AIDS Malignancy Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Cody J PeerClinical Pharmacology Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Wendy BernsteinHIV and AIDS Malignancy Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Karen AlemanHIV and AIDS Malignancy Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Mark N PolizzottoHIV and AIDS Malignancy Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
David VenzonBiostatistics and Data Management Section at the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Seth M SteinbergBiostatistics and Data Management Section at the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Vickie MarshallViral Oncology Section, AIDS and Cancer Virus Program, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, USA.
Denise WhitbyViral Oncology Section, AIDS and Cancer Virus Program, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, USA.
Richard F LittleHIV and AIDS Malignancy Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
John J WrightCancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Michelle A RudekAnalytical Pharmacology Core, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
William D FiggClinical Pharmacology Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Robert YarchoanHIV and AIDS Malignancy Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
National Cancer Institute · USLeidos (United States) · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Clinical Trials of Patients with AIDS-Related MalignanciesZIABC010888 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI YARCHOAN, ROBERT · 2009 to 2025
$20.6M
Sample Processing and Analytical Methods Development for New Anticancer AgentsZICSC006536 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI FIGG, WILLIAM DOUGLAS · 2009 to 2025
$18.1M
CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001E
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

lessons learnedOral targeted agents are desirable for treatment of Kaposi sarcoma (KS); however, in patients with HIV, drug-drug interactions must be considered. In this study to treat KS, sorafenib was poorly tolerated at doses less than those approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for hepatocellular carcinoma and other cancers, and showed only modest activity.Sorafenib's metabolism occurs via the CYP3A4 pathway, which is inhibited by ritonavir, a commonly used antiretroviral agent used by most patients in this study. Strong CYP3A4 inhibition by ritonavir may contribute to the observed sorafenib toxicity.Alternate antiretroviral agents without predicted interactions are preferred for co-administration in patients with HIV and cancers for which sorafenib is indicated.

backgroundWe conducted a phase Ib study of sorafenib, a vascular epithelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), c-kit, and platelet derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)-targeted treatment in Kaposi sarcoma (KS). We evaluated drug-drug interactions between sorafenib and ritonavir, an HIV medication with strong CYP3A4 inhibitory activity.

methodsTwo cohorts were enrolled: HIV-related KS on ritonavir (Cohort R) and HIV-related or classical KS not receiving ritonavir (Cohort NR). Sorafenib dose level 1 in cohort R (R1) was 200 mg daily and 200 mg every 12 hours in cohort NR (NR1). Steady-state pharmacokinetics were evaluated at cycle 1, day 8. KS responses and correlative factors were assessed.

resultsTen patients (nine HIV

conclusionSorafenib was poorly tolerated, and anti-KS activity was modest. Strong CYP3A4 inhibitors may contribute to sorafenib toxicity, and ritonavir has previously been shown to be a CYP3A4 inhibitor. Alternate antiretroviral agents without predicted interactions should be used when possible for concurrent administration with sorafenib.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCytochrome P-450 CYP3ADose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug InteractionsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitReceptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor betaRitonavirSarcoma, KaposiCYP3A4 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP3ANiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitReceptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor betaRitonavirSorafenibVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1

Identifiers

PMID28341759
PMCPMC5423501
OpenAlexW2601611703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.