Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28341716›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2017

Multiparametric Evaluation in Differentiating Glioma Recurrence from Treatment-Induced Necrosis Using Simultaneous

A Jena, S Taneja, A Jha, N K Damesha, P Negi, G K Jadhav, S M Verma, S K Sogani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. International EANM-SNMMI-ISMRM consensus recommendation for PET/MRI in oncology.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Neuro-oncology practice · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

A JenaFrom the PET SUITE (A. Jena, S.T., A. Jha, P.N.) drjena2002@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2154-7884
S TanejaFrom the PET SUITE (A. Jena, S.T., A. Jha, P.N.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0544-9133
A JhaFrom the PET SUITE (A. Jena, S.T., A. Jha, P.N.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1489-2471
N K DameshaNeurosurgery (N.K.D., S.K.S.), Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7260-1807
P NegiFrom the PET SUITE (A. Jena, S.T., A. Jha, P.N.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8591-6311
G K JadhavDepartments of Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Radiation Oncology (G.K.J., S.M.V.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3000-1154
S M VermaDepartments of Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Radiation Oncology (G.K.J., S.M.V.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2659-1393
S K SoganiNeurosurgery (N.K.D., S.K.S.), Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3531-0976

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeDifferentiating glioma recurrence from treatment-induced necrosis can be a challenge on conventional imaging. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of each functional MR imaging and PET parameter derived by using simultaneous FDG-PET/MR imaging individually and in combination in the evaluation of suspected glioma recurrence. MATERIALS AND

methodsThirty-five treated glioma patients with 41 enhancing lesions (World Health Organization grade II = 9, III = 13, IV = 19) on MR imaging after an operation followed by radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy formed part of this study. Using PET/MR imaging, we calculated the normalized mean relative CBV, mean ADC, Cho/Cr, and maximum and mean target-to-background ratios. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the diagnostic performance of each parameter by receiver operating characteristic analysis individually and in combination with multivariate receiver operating characteristic analysis for the detection of glioma recurrence. Histopathology or clinicoradiologic follow-up was considered the criterion standard.

resultsOf 35 patients, 25 (30 lesions) were classified as having a recurrence and 10 (11 lesions) patients as having treatment-induced necrosis. Parameters like rCBV

conclusionsSimultaneous PET/MR imaging with FDG offers correlative and synergistic multiparametric assessment of glioma recurrence with increased accuracy and clinical utility.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18GliomaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingNecrosisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeuroimagingPositron-Emission TomographyFluorodeoxyglucose F18

Identifiers

PMID28341716
PMCPMC7960371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.