Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28341685›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Use of a computerised decision aid (DA) to inform the decision process on adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II colorectal cancer: development and preliminary evaluation.

A Miles, I Chronakis, J Fox, A Mayer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05355727 (PROSAIC-DS), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05355727 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

PROSAIC-DS (PROState AI in Cancer - Decision Support): Evaluation of the Deontics AI Platform for Evidence-based Treatment Planning in Multidisciplinary Cancer Care: Increasing Compliance and Streamlining MDTs in Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustRan2022 to 2022Enrolled1,040ConditionsProstate CancerArmsClinical decision support tool recommended outcome
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Decision Aids: The Role of the Patient in Perioperative Safety.International anesthesiology clinics · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A MilesBirkbeck, University of London, London, UK.
I ChronakisUniversity College London, London, UK.
J FoxUniversity College London, London, UK.
A MayerRoyal Free London NHS Trust, London, UK.
University College London · GBBirkbeck, University of London · GBRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop a computerised decision aid (DA) to inform the decision process on adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II colorectal cancer, and examine perceived usefulness, acceptability and areas for improvement of the DA.

designMixed methods.

settingSingle outpatient oncology department in central London.

participantsConsecutive recruitment of 13 patients with stage II colorectal cancer, 12 of whom completed the study. Inclusion criteria were: age >18 years; complete resection for stage II adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum; patients within 14-56 days after surgery; no contraindication to adjuvant chemotherapy; able to give written informed consent. Exclusion criterion: previous chemotherapy. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: Patient perceived usefulness (assessed by the PrepDM questionnaire) and acceptability of the DA.

resultsPrepDM scores, measuring the perceived usefulness of the DA in preparing the patient to communicate with their doctor and make a health decision, were above those reported in other patient groups. Patient acceptability scores were also high; however, interviews showed that there was evidence of a lack of understanding of key information among some patients, in particular their baseline risk of recurrence, the net benefit of combination chemotherapy and the rationale for having chemotherapy when cancer had apparently gone.

conclusionsPatients found the DA acceptable and useful in supporting their decision about whether or not to have adjuvant chemotherapy. Suggested improvements for the DA include: sequential presentation of treatment options (eg, no treatment vs 1 drug, 1 drug vs 2 drugs) to enhance patient understanding of the difference between combination and single therapy, diagrams to help patients understand the rationale for chemotherapy to prevent a recurrence and inbuilt checks on patient understanding of baseline risk of recurrence and net benefit of chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChemotherapy, AdjuvantColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLondonMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesadjuvantCHEMOTHERAPYdecision aidpatient communicationQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID28341685
PMCPMC5372112
OpenAlexW2589595060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.