Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28341610›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2017

Differential effects of social and novelty enrichment on individual differences in impulsivity and behavioral flexibility.

Maya Zhe Wang, Andrew T Marshall, Kimberly Kirkpatrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Environmental enrichment and a selective metabotropic glutamate receptorPharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maya Zhe WangDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kansas State University, United States; Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, United States.
Andrew T MarshallDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kansas State University, United States; Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, University of California - Irvine, United States. Electronic address: marshaa1@uci.edu.
Kimberly KirkpatrickDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kansas State University, United States.
Kansas State University · US

Funding

Timing, Reward Processing and choiceR01MH085739 · NIMH · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, TRAVIS R, VONDER HAAR, COLE · 2010 to 2025
$4.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH085739
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early life experience profoundly impacts behavior and cognitive functions in rats. The present study investigated how the presence of conspecifics and/or novel objects, could independently influence individual differences in impulsivity and behavioral flexibility. Twenty-four rats were reared in an isolated condition, an isolated condition with a novel object, a pair-housed social condition, or a pair-housed social condition with a novel object. The rats were then tested on an impulsive choice task, a behavioral flexibility task, and an impulsive action task. Novelty enrichment produced an overall increase in impulsive choice, while social enrichment decreased impulsive choice in the absence of novelty enrichment and also produced an overall increase in impulsive action. In the behavioral flexibility task, social enrichment increased regressive errors, whereas both social and novelty enrichment reduced never-reinforced errors. Individual differences analyses indicated a significant relationship between performance in the behavioral flexibility and impulsive action tasks, which may reflect a common psychological correlate of action inhibition. Moreover, there was a relationship between delay sensitivity in the impulsive choice task and performance on the DRL and behavioral flexibility tasks, suggesting a dual role for timing and inhibitory processes in driving the interrelationship between these tasks. Overall, these results indicate that social and novelty enrichment produce distinct effects on impulsivity and adaptability, suggesting the need to parse out the different elements of enrichment in future studies. Further research is warranted to better understand how individual differences in sensitivity to enrichment affect individuals' interactions with and the resulting consequences of the rearing environment.

Indexed as

Executive FunctionHousing, AnimalImpulsive BehaviorIndividualityMotor ActivitySocial EnvironmentAnimalsConditioning, OperantDiscrimination, PsychologicalMalePsychological TestsRats, Sprague-DawleyBehavioral flexibilityDifferential rearingImpulsive actionImpulsive choiceIndividual differencesRats

Identifiers

PMID28341610
PMCPMC5473952
OpenAlexW2603589715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.