Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28341300›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2017

A phase I pharmacokinetic study of intraperitoneal bortezomib and carboplatin in patients with persistent or recurrent ovarian cancer: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Danielle A Jandial, William E Brady, Stephen B Howell, Heather A Lankes, Russell J Schilder, Jan H Beumer, Susan M Christner, Sandra Strychor, Matthew A Powell, Andrea R Hagemann and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Danielle A JandialUniversity of California Irvine Medical Center, United States.
William E BradyNRG Statistics and Data Management Center - Buffalo Office, United States. Electronic address: bbrady@gogstats.org.
Stephen B HowellMoores UCSD Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, United States. Electronic address: showell@ucsd.edu.
Heather A LankesNRG Statistics and Data Management Center - Buffalo Office, United States. Electronic address: hlankes@gogstats.org.
Russell J SchilderGynecologic Oncology, Thomas Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, PA, United States. Electronic address: russell.schilder@jefferson.edu.
Jan H BeumerUniversity of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, United States; University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy. United States; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, United States.
Susan M ChristnerUniversity of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, United States. Electronic address: christners@upmc.edu.
Sandra StrychorUniversity of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, United States. Electronic address: ssdk1106@comcast.net.
Matthew A PowellWashington University, St. Louis, United States. Electronic address: powellm@wudosis.wustl.edu.
Andrea R HagemannWashington University, St. Louis, United States. Electronic address: hagemanna@wudosis.wustl.edu.
Kathleen N MooreOklahoma University Medical Center, United States. Electronic address: kathleen-moore@ouhsc.edu.
Joan L WalkerOklahoma University Medical Center, United States. Electronic address: joan-walker@ouhsc.edu.
Paul A DiSilvestroWomen & Infants' Hospital of Rhode Island, United States. Electronic address: PDiSilvestro@Wihri.org.
Linda R DuskaUVA Cancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States. Electronic address: lrd5d@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu.
Paula M FracassoUVA Cancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States. Electronic address: fracasso@virginia.edu.
Don S DizonMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, United States. Electronic address: ddizon@partners.org.
NRG Oncology · USUniversity Medical Center · USUniversity of Virginia · USUPMC Hillman Cancer Center · USWashington University in St. Louis · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of California, Irvine Medical Center · USUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USWomen & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island · US

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Jessie Nedrow · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
Statistics CoreU10CA180822 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI James J. Dignam · 2014 to 2026
$146.4M
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP HEADQUARTERSU10CA027469 · NCI · GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP · PI DISAIA, PHILIP J. · 1985 to 2013
$132.6M
Two-Spirit Films in Indigenous Cancer HealthP30CA016056 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI MARK G FRATTINI · 1985 to 2026
$116.6M
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP STATISTICAL OFFICEU10CA037517 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI BLESSING, JOHN A · 1985 to 2013
$67.4M
NRG Oncology Biospecimen BankU24CA196067 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Tanner J. Freeman, Nilsa Del Carmen Ramirez Milan · 2015 to 2026
$42.6M
Washington University/ Siteman Cancer Center Lead Academic SiteU10CA180833 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BARTLETT, NANCY L, KOZOWER, BENJAMIN D · 2014 to 2018
$7.6M
Lead Academic Participating Site for the Development and Conduct of NCTN TrialsU10CA180798 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI MANNEL, ROBERT S., MOORE, KATHLEEN N. · 2014 to 2018
$6.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016056NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904NCI NIH HHS U10 CA027469NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037517NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180798NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180822NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180833NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS U24 CA196067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIntraperitoneal (IP) therapy improves survival compared to intravenous (IV) treatment for women with newly diagnosed, optimally cytoreduced, ovarian cancer. However, the role of IP therapy in recurrent disease is unknown. Preclinical data demonstrated IP administration of the proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib prior to IP carboplatin increased tumor platinum accumulation resulting in synergistic cytotoxicity. We conducted this phase I trial of IP bortezomib and carboplatin in women with recurrent disease.

methodsWomen with recurrent ovarian cancer were treated with escalating doses of IP bortezomib - in combination with IP carboplatin (AUC 4 or 5) every 21days for 6cycles. Pharmacokinetics of both agents were evaluated in cycle 1.

resultsThirty-three women participated; 32 were evaluable for safety. Two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at the first dose level (carboplatin AUC 5, bortezomib 0.5mg/m

conclusionIP administration of this novel combination was feasible and showed promising activity in this phase I trial of heavily pre-treated women with ovarian cancer. Further evaluation of this IP combination should be conducted.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBortezomibCarboplatinCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansInfusions, ParenteralMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialOvarian NeoplasmsYoung AdultBortezomibCarboplatinIntraperitonealOvarian cancerPlatinumProteasome inhibition

Identifiers

PMID28341300
PMCPMC5706109
OpenAlexW2599597567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.