Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28341235›Full record

ReviewTrends in neurosciences2017

Physiological Markers of Motor Inhibition during Human Behavior.

Julie Duque, Ian Greenhouse, Ludovica Labruna, Richard B Ivry

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in neurosciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Temporal Dynamics of EEG Reflect Continuous Error Correction during Force Control.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Common and Unique Neurophysiological Processes That Support the Stopping and Revising of Actions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Does the stop-signal P3 reflect inhibitory control?Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2025
    Review
  20. Review

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julie DuqueInstitute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: julie.duque@uclouvain.be.
Ian GreenhouseDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA; Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Ludovica LabrunaDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA; Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Richard B IvryDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA; Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Funding

Embodied Decision Making: The Influence of Action Errors on Reinforcement LearningR01NS092079 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI IVRY, RICHARD · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
Neural Mechanisms Underlying Hand Choice for Unimanual ActionR01NS074917 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI IVRY, RICHARD · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
The Role of Ipsilateral Cortical Control of the Upper Limb in Monkey and ManR01NS097480 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI CARMENA, JOSE MIGUEL · 2017 to 2020
$1.5M
The role of ipsilateral cortical control of the upper limb in monkey and manR56NS097480 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI CARMENA, JOSE MIGUEL · 2016 to 2016
$520k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS074917NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS092079NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS097480NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS097480
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies in humans have shown that many behaviors engage processes that suppress excitability within the corticospinal tract. Inhibition of the motor output pathway has been extensively studied in the context of action stopping, where a planned movement needs to be abruptly aborted. Recent TMS work has also revealed markers of motor inhibition during the preparation of movement. Here, we review the evidence for motor inhibition during action stopping and action preparation, focusing on studies that have used TMS to monitor changes in the excitability of the corticospinal pathway. We discuss how these physiological results have motivated theoretical models of how the brain selects actions, regulates movement initiation and execution, and switches from one state to another.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalHumansMotor ActivityPyramidal TractsTranscranial Magnetic Stimulationaction selectioncorticospinal excitabilityinhibitory controlreactive and proactive inhibitiontranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID28341235
PMCPMC5389740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.