ArticleFertility and sterility2016
Predicting first trimester pregnancy outcome: derivation of a multiple marker test.
Article in Fertility and sterility, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05591599 (Diagnostic Value of Calponin 2 in Identifying Tubal Pregnancies), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Diagnostic Value of Calponin 2 in Identifying Tubal Pregnancies
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- The diagnosis and management of extrauterine and uterine ectopic pregnancy.Human reproduction update · 2026Review
- PAPPA's role in female reproduction.Reproduction (Cambridge, England) · 2025Review
- Evaluation of novel biomarkers for early pregnancy outcome prediction†.Biology of reproduction · 2024Article
- Ectopic pregnancy: search for biomarker in salivary proteome.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Identification and verification of plasma protein biomarkers that accurately identify an ectopic pregnancy.Clinical proteomics · 2023Article
- Biomarkers at 6 weeks' gestation in the prediction of early miscarriage in pregnancy following assisted reproductive technology.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2023Article
- Validation of a multiple marker test for early pregnancy outcome prediction.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023Article
- Proteome-defined changes in cellular pathways for decidua and trophoblast tissues associated with location and viability of early-stage pregnancy.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2022Article
- Maternal high-fat diet during pregnancy with concurrent phthalate exposure leads to abnormal placentation.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Predicting first-trimester outcome of embryos with cardiac activity in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Article
- Endogenous progesterone levels could predict reproductive outcome in frozen embryo replacement cycles supplemented with synthetic progestogens: A retrospective cohort study.Reproductive medicine and biology · 2019Article
- Role of various complete blood count parameters in predicting the success of single-dose Methotrexate in treating ectopic pregnancy.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo predict first trimester pregnancy outcome using biomarkers in a multicenter cohort.
designCase-control study.
settingThree academic centers. PATIENT(S): Women with pain and bleeding in early pregnancy. INTERVENTION(S): Sera from women who were 5-12 weeks' gestational age with ectopic pregnancy (EP), viable intrauterine pregnancy (IUP), and miscarriage/spontaneous abortion (SAB) was analyzed by ELISA and immunoassay for activin A, inhibin A, P, A Disintegrin And Metalloprotease-12, pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A), pregnancy specific B MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Area under receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of first trimester pregnancy outcome. RESULT(S): In 230 pregnancies, the combination of trees to maximize sensitivity and specificity resulted in 73% specificity (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-0.80) and 31% sensitivity (95% CI 0.21-0.43) for viability. Similar methods had 21% sensitivity (95% CI 0.12-0.32) and 33% specificity (95% CI 0.26-0.41) for location. Activin A, Glyc, and A Disintegrin And Metalloprotease-12 definitively classified pregnancy location in 29% of the sample with 100% accuracy for EP. Progesterone and PAPP-A classified the viability in 61% of the sample with 94% accuracy. CONCLUSION(S): Multiple marker panels can distinguish pregnancy location and viability in a subset of women at risk for early pregnancy complications. This strategy of combining markers to maximize sensitivity and specificity results in high accuracy in a subset of subjects. Activin A, ADAM12, and Glyc are the most promising markers for pregnancy location; P and PAPP-A for viability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.