Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28340610›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2017

The importance of informational, clinical and personal support in patient experience with total knee replacement: a qualitative investigation.

Laurie J Goldsmith, Nitya Suryaprakash, Ellen Randall, Jessica Shum, Valerie MacDonald, Richard Sawatzky, Samar Hejazi, Jennifer C Davis, Patrick McAllister, Stirling Bryan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Return to sport after total knee arthroplasty: an Australian perspective.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Laurie J GoldsmithFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Blusson Hall 10506, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada. laurie_goldsmith@sfu.ca.
Nitya SuryaprakashCentre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, 7th floor, 828 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Ellen RandallCentre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, 7th floor, 828 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Jessica ShumCentre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, 7th floor, 828 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Valerie MacDonaldBurnaby Hospital & Surgical Network, Fraser Health, 3935 Kincaid Street, Burnaby, BC, V5K 2X6, Canada.
Richard SawatzkySchool of Nursing, Trinity Western University, 7600 Glover Road, Langley, BC, V2Y 1Y1, Canada.
Samar HejaziDepartment of Evaluation and Research Service, Fraser Health, Suite 400, Central City Tower, 13450 102 Avenue, Surrey, BC, V3T 0H1, Canada.
Jennifer C DavisDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 212 Friedman Building, 2177 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Patrick McAllisterRebalance MD, 104-3551 Blanshard Street, Victoria, BC, V8Z 0B9, Canada.
Stirling BryanCentre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, 7th floor, 828 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAFraser Health · CAVancouver Coastal Health Research Institute · CASimon Fraser University · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

CIHR 114106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the most frequently performed joint replacement surgery in North America. Patient perspectives on TKA have been investigated in various ways, including finding as many as 20% of TKA patients are dissatisfied with their surgical outcomes. Understanding the patient experience with TKA broadly and in relation to patient satisfaction is a key gap in existing literature.

methodsWe report on the qualitative component of a mixed methods prospective cohort study examining patient experience and satisfaction post-TKA for adults in British Columbia, Canada. Data collection consisted of 45 in-depth interviews about individuals' knee surgery experiences conducted eight months after surgery. Analysis consisted of thematic coding by multiple coders.

resultsParticipants' descriptions of their TKA experiences were primarily concerned with support, or the provision of aid and assistance. Support was insufficient when their expectations of support were not met; unmet support expectations led to an overall negative TKA experience. Support operated in three key domains: (1) informational support, (2) clinical support, and (3) personal support. Key sources of informational and clinical support included pre-optimisation clinics, surgeons, and physiotherapists. Key topics for informational support included pain, pain management, and recovery trajectories. Personal support was provided by family, friends, other TKA patients, employers, and themselves.

conclusionsPatient needs and expectations for support are shaped both before and after TKA surgery. Patients with an overall positive TKA experience had improvement in their knee pain, stiffness or functioning post-TKA, had their major expectations and needs for support met during their TKA recovery, and believed that any significant future expectations or needs for ongoing support would be adequately met. In contrast, patients with an overall negative TKA experience had at least one major expectation or need for support not met during their TKA recovery, even in cases where they had good TKA outcomes. Suggested interventions to improve the experience of persons receiving TKA include an expanded patient navigator model, revised pre-surgery educational materials, particularly around pain expectations and management, and comprehensive sharing of other patients' TKA experience.

Indexed as

AgedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeCommunicationFemaleHumansMaleSocial SupportPatient-centred carePatient experienceQualitative researchSupportTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID28340610
PMCPMC5366158
OpenAlexW2600721266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.