Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28340572›Full record

Trial reportBMC pediatrics2017

Does sevoflurane add to outpatient procedural sedation in children? A randomised clinical trial.

Hugo Sérgio de Oliveira Gomes, Heloisa de Sousa Gomes, Joji Sado-Filho, Luciane Rezende Costa, Paulo Sucasas Costa

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02284204 (Use of Sevoflurane, Midazolam and Ketamine in Children for Dental Sedation Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02284204 phase2completednot on this map

Use of Sevoflurane, Midazolam and Ketamine in Children for Dental Sedation Treatment: Occurrence of Adverse Events

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade Federal de GoiasRan2012 to 2014Enrolled27ConditionsDental AnxietyArmsMidazolam, Ketamine and Sevoflurane, Midazolam and Ketamine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Sedation of children undergoing dental treatment.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Conscious Sedation in Dentistry.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hugo Sérgio de Oliveira GomesUniversidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.
Heloisa de Sousa GomesDentistry Graduate Program, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.
Joji Sado-FilhoUniversity Hospital, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.
Luciane Rezende CostaFaculty of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.
Paulo Sucasas CostaDepartment of Paediatrics, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Faculdade de Medicina, Rua 235 com Primeira Avenida, sem número, Setor Universitário, Goiânia, CEP 74605-020, Brazil. paulosucasas@ufg.br.
Universidade Federal de Goiás · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is little evidence concerning the effect of sevoflurane in outpatient procedural sedation, especially in children. We hypothesised that the addition of sevoflurane to a sedation regimen improves children's behaviour with minimal adverse events.

methodsThis is a randomised, triple-blind clinical trial conducted on an outpatient basis. Participants were 27 healthy children aged 4 to 6 years, who previously refused dental treatment with non-pharmacologic methods. All participants received oral midazolam (0.5 mg/kg, maximum 20 mg) and oral ketamine (3 mg/kg, maximum 50 mg) and, in addition: Group MK - 100% oxygen; Group MKS - inhalational sevoflurane at a sedative dose (final expired concentration between 0.3 and 0.4%). Dental appointments were video recorded for assessment of the children's sleep patterns, crying, movements, and overall behaviour during the procedure with the Houpt scale. Intra- and post-operative adverse events were systematically reported. Data were analysed by bivariate analyses in the IBM SPSS v. 19, at a significance level of 5%.

resultsMK (n = 13) and MKS (n = 14) did not differ regarding the Houpt scores (P > 0.05), but 53.8% of children in the MK group showed hysterical and continuous crying at the time of the local anaesthesia injection, compared to 7.1% of children in the MKS group (P = 0.01; phi = 0.5). There was a trend toward less crying and movement over time during the dental appointment in the MKS group (P = 0.48). Minor adverse events were observed in 10 MK children and 4 MKS children (P = 0.01).

conclusionsThe addition of sevoflurane to oral midazolam-ketamine improved the children's crying behaviour during local anaesthetic administration, and did not increase the occurrence of adverse events.

trial registrationClinical Trials NCT02284204 . Registered 5 October 2014.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, InhalationMethyl EthersAdministration, OralAmbulatory CareAnesthetics, DissociativeAnesthetics, LocalChildChild BehaviorChild, PreschoolCryingDental Care for ChildrenDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesAnesthetics, DissociativeAnesthetics, InhalationAnesthetics, LocalHypnotics and SedativesKetamineMethyl EthersMidazolamSevofluraneAnti-anxiety agentsChild behaviourConscious sedationDental anxietyDental care for childrenDrug-related side effects and adverse reactionsKetamineMidazolamPain managementSevoflurane

Identifiers

PMID28340572
PMCPMC5366115
OpenAlexW2601418623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.