ReviewBMC neurology2017
A critical review of manual therapy use for headache disorders: prevalence, profiles, motivations, communication and self-reported effectiveness.
Review in BMC neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effectiveness of manual and exercise therapy on headache intensity and frequency among patients with cervicogenic headache: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2022Pooled it
- The Impact of Spinal Manipulation on Migraine Pain and Disability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Headache · 2019Pooled it
- Can upper cervical manual therapy affect the blink reflex in subjects with migraine and neck pain?The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2024Trial
- Effects of diacutaneous fibrolysis in patients with tension-type headache: A randomized controlled trial.PloS one · 2023Trial
- Diagnostic approach and management of patients with headache in Danish chiropractic practice.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2026Article
- The Prevalence of Massage Therapy Utilization for Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Systematic Review.International journal of therapeutic massage & bodywork · 2025Article
- "The Dark Side of Musculoskeletal Care": Why Do Ineffective Techniques Seem to Work? A Comprehensive Review of Complementary and Alternative Therapies.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Clinical features, risk factors, and a nomogram for predicting refractory cervicogenic headache: a retrospective multivariate analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Hallmarks of primary headache: part 1 - migraine.The journal of headache and pain · 2024Review
- Review
- Article
- Individual endogenous pain modulation profiles within a multidimensional context of people with cervicogenic headache - A retrospective exploratory study.Musculoskeletal science & practice · 2023Article
- Cervical Impairments in Subjects with Chronic Migraine: An Observational Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Inter-individual variability in mechanical pain sensation in patients with cervicogenic headache: an explorative study.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The Addition of Diacutaneous Fibrolysis to a Pharmacological Intervention in Patients with Tension-Type Headache: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Potential Add-On Effects of Manual Therapy Techniques in Migraine Patients: A Randomised Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Instrumental assessment of physiotherapy and onabolulinumtoxin-A on cervical and headache parameters in chronic migraine.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022Observational
- Exploring multidimensional characteristics in cervicogenic headache: Relations between pain processing, lifestyle, and psychosocial factors.Brain and behavior · 2021Article
- Effectiveness of Manual Therapy and Acupuncture in Tension-Type Headache: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2021Review
- Osteopathic empirical research: a bibliometric analysis from 1966 to 2018.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the expansion of conventional medical treatments for headache, many sufferers of common recurrent headache disorders seek help outside of medical settings. The aim of this paper is to evaluate research studies on the prevalence of patient use of manual therapies for the treatment of headache and the key factors associated with this patient population.
methodsThis critical review of the peer-reviewed literature identified 35 papers reporting findings from new empirical research regarding the prevalence, profiles, motivations, communication and self-reported effectiveness of manual therapy use amongst those with headache disorders.
resultsWhile available data was limited and studies had considerable methodological limitations, the use of manual therapy appears to be the most common non-medical treatment utilized for the management of common recurrent headaches. The most common reason for choosing this type of treatment was seeking pain relief. While a high percentage of these patients likely continue with concurrent medical care, around half may not be disclosing the use of this treatment to their medical doctor.
conclusionsThere is a need for more rigorous public health and health services research in order to assess the role, safety, utilization and financial costs associated with manual therapy treatment for headache. Primary healthcare providers should be mindful of the use of this highly popular approach to headache management in order to help facilitate safe, effective and coordinated care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.