Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28340557›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2017

Development of selective medium for IMP-type carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in stool specimens.

Norihisa Yamamoto, Ryuji Kawahara, Yukihiro Akeda, Rathina Kumar Shanmugakani, Hisao Yoshida, Hideharu Hagiya, Naohiro Hara, Isao Nishi, Satomi Yukawa, Rumiko Asada and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. IDCases · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Spreading Patterns of NDM-ProducingAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Norihisa YamamotoDepartment of Infection Control and Prevention, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Ryuji KawaharaDepartment of Bacteriology, Osaka Prefectural Institute of Public Health, Osaka, Japan.
Yukihiro AkedaDepartment of Infection Control and Prevention, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. akeda@biken.osaka-u.ac.jp.
Rathina Kumar ShanmugakaniDepartment of Infection Control and Prevention, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Hisao YoshidaDepartment of Infection Control and Prevention, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Hideharu HagiyaDepartment of Infection Control and Prevention, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Naohiro HaraDepartment of Infection Control and Prevention, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Isao NishiLaboratory for Clinical Investigation, Osaka University Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Satomi YukawaDepartment of Infection Control and Prevention, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Rumiko AsadaIbaraki Public Health Center, Osaka, Japan.
Yumi SasakiClinical Laboratory Department Section 1, The Research Foundation for Microbial Diseases of Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuhiro MaedaClinical Laboratory Department Section 1, The Research Foundation for Microbial Diseases of Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Noriko SakamotoResearch Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Shigeyuki HamadaResearch Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Kazunori TomonoDepartment of Infection Control and Prevention, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Osaka University · JPProtein Research Foundation · JPOsaka Prefectural Institute of Public Health · JPOsaka University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentification of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) in faecal specimens is challenging. This fact is particularly critical because low-level carbapenem-resistant organisms such as IMP-producing CPE are most prevalent in Japan. We developed a modified selective medium more suitable for IMP-type CPE.

methodsFifteen reference CPE strains producing different types of β-lactamases were used to evaluate the commercially available CHROMagar KPC and chromID CARBA as well as the newly prepared MC-ECC medium (CHROMagar ECC supplemented with meropenem, cloxacillin, and ZnSO

resultsAll tested strains producing NDM-, KPC-, and OXA-48-carbapenemases were successfully cultured in the media employed. Although most of the IMP-positive strains did not grow in CHROMagar KPC, chromID CARBA, or MC-ECC, all tested strains grew on M-ECC. When faecal samples were applied to the media, M-ECC medium allowed the best growth of IMP-type CPE with a significantly higher sensitivity (99.3%) than that of chromID CARBA (13.9%).

conclusionsM-ECC medium was determined as the most favourable selective medium for the detection of IMP-type CPE as well as other types of CPE.

Indexed as

Bacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesCulture MediaEnterobacteriaceaeEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsBacterial Typing TechniquesFecesHumansInosine MonophosphateBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasescarbapenemaseCulture MediaInosine MonophosphateCarbapenemase-producing EnterobacteriaceaeFaecal specimensIMPSelective culture medium

Identifiers

PMID28340557
PMCPMC5366124
OpenAlexW2597991812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.