Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28340145›Full record

Trial reportPain medicine (Malden, Mass.)2018

Human Abuse Potential of the New Opioid Analgesic Molecule NKTR-181 Compared with Oxycodone.

Lynn Webster, Jack Henningfield, August R Buchhalter, Suresh Siddhanti, Lin Lu, Aleksandrs Odinecs, Carlo J Di Fonzo, Michael A Eldon

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Recent Advances in Peripheral Opioid Receptor Therapeutics.Current pain and headache reports · 2021
    Review
  11. Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Interpol review of controlled substances 2016-2019.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lynn WebsterPRA Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Jack HenningfieldThe Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland.
August R BuchhalterPinney Associates, Bethesda, Maryland.
Suresh SiddhantiNektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, California, USA.
Lin LuNektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, California, USA.
Aleksandrs OdinecsNektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, California, USA.
Carlo J Di FonzoNektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, California, USA.
Michael A EldonNektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, California, USA.
Nektar Therapeutics (United States) · USPinney Associates (United States)PRA Health Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate the human abuse potential, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of NKTR-181, a novel mu-opioid agonist molecule, relative to oxycodone. Design: This randomized, single-center, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled five-period crossover study enrolled healthy, adult, non-physically dependent recreational opioid users. Setting: Inpatient clinical research site. Subjects: Forty-two randomized subjects (73.8% male, 81% white, mean age = 25 years). Methods: The primary objective was to evaluate single orally administered 100, 200, and 400 mg NKTR-181 doses in solution compared with 40 mg oxycodone and placebo solutions using the Drug Liking visual analog scale. Secondary measures included the Drug Effects Questionnaire, Addiction Research Center Inventory/Morphine Benzedrine Group Subscale, Price Value Assessment Questionnaire, Global Assessment of Overall Drug Liking, and Take Drug Again Assessment. Central nervous system mu-opioid effects were assessed using pupillometry. The study included qualifying and treatment phases. Subjects received each of the five treatments using a crossover design. Results: NKTR-181 at all dose levels had significantly lower Drug Liking Emax than oxycodone (P < 0.0001). Drug Liking scores for oxycodone increased rapidly within 15 minutes and peaked at approximately one hour postdose, whereas Drug Liking (and most secondary abuse potential measures) for all doses of NKTR-181 were comparable with placebo for at least the first hour. Only the 400 mg Drug Liking scores were minimally differentiated vs placebo from one and a half to four hours, but remained significantly lower than oxycodone (P < 0.003). NKTR-181 treatment-related adverse effects were mild and occurred at a lower rate compared with oxycodone. Conclusions: NKTR-181 demonstrated delayed onset of CNS effects and significantly lower abuse potential scores compared with oxycodone in recreational opioid users.

Indexed as

Opioid-Related DisordersAdultAnalgesics, OpioidCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMorphinansOxycodoneYoung AdultAnalgesics, OpioidMorphinansNKTR-181OxycodoneAbuse PotentialChronic PainDrug LikingNKTR-181OpioidOxycodone

Identifiers

PMID28340145
PMCPMC5914314
OpenAlexW2592877410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.