Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28340131›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of clinical pathology2017

Interobserver Variability in Histologic Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis Using Categorical and Quantitative Scores.

Michael Pavlides, Jacqueline Birks, Eve Fryer, David Delaney, Nikita Sarania, Rajarshi Banerjee, Stefan Neubauer, Eleanor Barnes, Kenneth A Fleming, Lai Mun Wang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of clinical pathology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Gut-Liver Axis in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: From Mechanistic Insights to Precision Therapeutics.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Digital Pathology Quantification of the Continuum of Cirrhosis Severity in Human Liver Biopsies.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Article
  13. Therapeutic Strategies for MASH: An Update on Drug Candidates Under Investigation in Late-Phase Clinical Trials.International journal of translational medicine (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michael PavlidesTranslational Gastroenterology Unit, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Jacqueline BirksCentre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Eve FryerDepartment of Histopathology, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
David DelaneyDepartment of Histopathology, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
Nikita SaraniaMedical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Medical Sciences Office, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Rajarshi BanerjeePerspectum Diagnostics, Oxford, UK.
Stefan NeubauerOxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Eleanor BarnesTranslational Gastroenterology Unit, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Kenneth A FlemingMedical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Medical Sciences Office, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Lai Mun WangDepartment of Histopathology, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K010239/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the study was to investigate the interobserver agreement for categorical and quantitative scores of liver fibrosis. Methods: Sixty-five consecutive biopsy specimens from patients with mixed liver disease etiologies were assessed by three pathologists using the Ishak and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network (NASH CRN) scoring systems, and the fibrosis area (collagen proportionate area [CPA]) was estimated by visual inspection (visual-CPA). A subset of 20 biopsy specimens was analyzed using digital imaging analysis (DIA) for the measurement of CPA (DIA-CPA). Results: The bivariate weighted κ between any two pathologists ranged from 0.57 to 0.67 for Ishak staging and from 0.47 to 0.57 for the NASH CRN staging. Bland-Altman analysis showed poor agreement between all possible pathologist pairings for visual-CPA but good agreement between all pathologist pairings for DIA-CPA. There was good agreement between the two pathologists who assessed biopsy specimens by visual-CPA and DIA-CPA. The intraclass correlation coefficient, which is equivalent to the κ statistic for continuous variables, was 0.78 for visual-CPA and 0.97 for DIA-CPA. Conclusions: These results suggest that DIA-CPA is the most robust method for assessing liver fibrosis followed by visual-CPA. Categorical scores perform less well than both the quantitative CPA scores assessed here.

Indexed as

BiopsyCohort StudiesCollagenHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLiverLiver CirrhosisObserver VariationCollagenBland-Altman plotCollagen proportionate areaDigital imaging analysisstatisticκ

Identifiers

PMID28340131
PMCPMC5848246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.