Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28339883›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2017

Interventions to improve immigrant health. A scoping review.

Esperanza Diaz, Gaby Ortiz-Barreda, Yoav Ben-Shlomo, Michelle Holdsworth, Bukola Salami, Anu Rammohan, Roger Yat-Nork Chung, Sabu S Padmadas, Thomas Krafft

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Migration health research in Norway: a scoping review.Scandinavian journal of public health · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Framework for refugee and migrant health research in the WHO European Region.Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Esperanza DiazDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Gaby Ortiz-BarredaDepartment of Health Promotion and Development, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Yoav Ben-ShlomoSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Michelle HoldsworthSchool of Health and Related Research- ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Bukola SalamiFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada.
Anu RammohanDiscipline of Economics, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Roger Yat-Nork ChungSchool of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Sabu S PadmadasUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Thomas KrafftFaculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: : Disparities in health between immigrants and their host populations have been described across countries and continents. Hence, interventions for improving health targeting general populations are not necessarily effective for immigrants. To conduct a systematic search of the literature evaluating health interventions for immigrants; to map the characteristics of identified studies including range of interventions, immigrant populations and their host countries, clinical areas targeted and reported evaluations, challenges and limitations of the interventions identified. Following the results, to develop recommendations for research in the field. A scoping review approach was chosen to provide an overview of the type, extent and quantity of research available. Studies were included if they empirically evaluated health interventions targeting immigrants and/or their descendants, included a control group, and were published in English (PubMed and Embase from 1990 to 2015). Most of the 83 studies included were conducted in the USA, encompassed few immigrant groups and used a randomized controlled trial (RCT) or cluster RCT design. Most interventions addressed chronic and non-communicable diseases and attendance at cancer screening services, used individual targeted approaches, targeted adult women and recruited participants from health centres. Outcome measures were often subjective, with the exception of interventions for cardiovascular risk and diabetes. Generally, authors claimed that interventions were beneficial, despite a number of reported limitations. Recommendations for enhancing interventions to improve immigrant health are provided to help researchers, funders and health care commissioners when deciding upon the scope, nature and design of future research in this area.

Indexed as

Emigrants and ImmigrantsHealth StatusHealth Status DisparitiesHumans

Identifiers

PMID28339883
PMCPMC5445720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.