Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28339700›Full record

ReviewNeuro-oncology2017

A clinical perspective on the 2016 WHO brain tumor classification and routine molecular diagnostics.

Martin J van den Bent, Michael Weller, Patrick Y Wen, Johan M Kros, Ken Aldape, Susan Chang

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuro-oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. An enduring debate on gliomatosis cerebri.Brain tumor pathology · 2023
    Review
  18. The Chemokine Receptor CCR1 Mediates Microglia Stimulated Glioma Invasion.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Martin J van den BentDepartment of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Michael WellerDepartment of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Patrick Y WenCenter for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
Johan M KrosDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Ken AldapeDepartment of Pathology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Canada
Susan ChangDivision of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco,San Francisco, California
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NLCenter for Neuro-Oncology · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USNeurological Surgery · USPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2007 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of brain tumors did not use molecular abnormalities as diagnostic criteria. Studies have shown that genotyping allows a better prognostic classification of diffuse glioma with improved treatment selection. This has resulted in a major revision of the WHO classification, which is now for adult diffuse glioma centered around isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) and 1p/19q diagnostics. This revised classification is reviewed with a focus on adult brain tumors, and includes a recommendation of genes of which routine testing is clinically useful. Apart from assessment of IDH mutational status including sequencing of R132H-immunohistochemistry negative cases and testing for 1p/19q, several other markers can be considered for routine testing, including assessment of copy number alterations of chromosome 7 and 10 and of TERT promoter, BRAF, and H3F3A mutations. For "glioblastoma, IDH mutated" the term "astrocytoma grade IV" could be considered. It should be considered to treat IDH wild-type grades II and III diffuse glioma with polysomy of chromosome 7 and loss of 10q as glioblastoma. New developments must be more quickly translated into further revised diagnostic categories. Quality control and rapid integration of molecular findings into the final diagnosis and the communication of the final diagnosis to clinicians require systematic attention.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDiagnostic Tests, RoutineHumansWorld Health Organization1p/19q codeletion7+/10LOHgliomaIDHWHO classification

Identifiers

PMID28339700
PMCPMC5464438
OpenAlexW2590076094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.