Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28339555›Full record

ArticlePain medicine (Malden, Mass.)2017

An Item Bank for Abuse of Prescription Pain Medication from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®).

Paul A Pilkonis, Lan Yu, Nathan E Dodds, Kelly L Johnston, Suzanne M Lawrence, Thomas F Hilton, Dennis C Daley, Ashwin A Patkar, Dennis McCarty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paul A PilkonisDepartments of Psychiatry.
Lan YuDepartments of Psychiatry.
Nathan E DoddsDepartments of Psychiatry.
Kelly L JohnstonDepartments of Psychiatry.
Suzanne M LawrenceDepartments of Psychiatry.
Thomas F HiltonNational Institute on Drug Abuse, Indian Harbour Beach, Florida.
Dennis C DaleyDepartments of Psychiatry.
Ashwin A PatkarDepartment of Psychiatry, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Dennis McCartySchool of Public Health, Oregon Health and Science University and Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Funding

Validation and domain development in mental health and sleep-wake functionU01AR052155 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PILKONIS, PAUL A · 2004 to 2013
$6.0M
NIAMS NIH HHS U01 AR052155
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThere is a need to monitor patients receiving prescription opioids to detect possible signs of abuse. To address this need, we developed and calibrated an item bank for severity of abuse of prescription pain medication as part of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS ® ).

methodsComprehensive literature searches yielded an initial bank of 5,310 items relevant to substance use and abuse, including abuse of prescription pain medication, from over 80 unique instruments. After qualitative item analysis (i.e., focus groups, cognitive interviewing, expert review, and item revision), 25 items for abuse of prescribed pain medication were included in field testing. Items were written in a first-person, past-tense format, with a three-month time frame and five response options reflecting frequency or severity. The calibration sample included 448 respondents, 367 from the general population (ascertained through an internet panel) and 81 from community treatment programs participating in the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network.

resultsA final bank of 22 items was calibrated using the two-parameter graded response model from item response theory. A seven-item static short form was also developed. The test information curve showed that the PROMIS ® item bank for abuse of prescription pain medication provided substantial information in a broad range of severity.

conclusionThe initial psychometric characteristics of the item bank support its use as a computerized adaptive test or short form, with either version providing a brief, precise, and efficient measure relevant to both clinical and community samples.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresSubstance-Related DisordersAdultAgedAnalgesicsFemaleHealth Information SystemsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsAnalgesicsItem Response TheoryMeasurementOpioid UsePrescription Pain MedicationPROMISSubstance Use

Identifiers

PMID28339555
PMCPMC6279310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.