Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28339516›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2017

Improving a full-text search engine: the importance of negation detection and family history context to identify cases in a biomedical data warehouse.

Nicolas Garcelon, Antoine Neuraz, Vincent Benoit, Rémi Salomon, Anita Burgun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Clinical Information Retrieval: A Literature Review.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The prediction of hospital length of stay using unstructured data.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Ad Hoc Information Extraction for Clinical Data Warehouses.Methods of information in medicine · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicolas GarcelonInstitut Imagine, Paris Descartes Université Paris Descartes-Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Antoine NeurazInstitut Imagine, Paris Descartes Université Paris Descartes-Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Vincent BenoitInstitut Imagine, Paris Descartes Université Paris Descartes-Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Rémi SalomonInstitut Imagine, Paris Descartes Université Paris Descartes-Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Anita BurgunINSERM, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, UMR 1138 Equipe 22, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe repurposing of electronic health records (EHRs) can improve clinical and genetic research for rare diseases. However, significant information in rare disease EHRs is embedded in the narrative reports, which contain many negated clinical signs and family medical history. This paper presents a method to detect family history and negation in narrative reports and evaluates its impact on selecting populations from a clinical data warehouse (CDW). MATERIALS AND

methodsWe developed a pipeline to process 1.6 million reports from multiple sources. This pipeline is part of the load process of the Necker Hospital CDW.

resultsWe identified patients with "Lupus and diarrhea," "Crohn's and diabetes," and "NPHP1" from the CDW. The overall precision, recall, specificity, and F-measure were 0.85, 0.98, 0.93, and 0.91, respectively.

conclusionThe proposed method generates a highly accurate identification of cases from a CDW of rare disease EHRs.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsMedical History TakingSearch EngineData WarehousingFamily HealthHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalNatural Language ProcessingRare Diseasesdata warehouseelectronic health recordsnatural language processingrare diseasessearch engine

Identifiers

PMID28339516
PMCPMC7651926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.