Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28339459›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2017

Functional classification of DNA variants by hybrid minigenes: Identification of 30 spliceogenic variants of BRCA2 exons 17 and 18.

Eugenia Fraile-Bethencourt, Beatriz Díez-Gómez, Valeria Velásquez-Zapata, Alberto Acedo, David J Sanz, Eladio A Velasco

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cancer genomic profiling predicts pathogenicity ofmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Functional Characterization ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Identification of a newMolecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Clinically SignificantCancers · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Identification of a large intra-exonic deletion inTherapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eugenia Fraile-BethencourtSplicing and genetic susceptibility to cancer, Instituto de Biología y Genética Molecular (CSIC-UVa), Valladolid, Spain.
Beatriz Díez-GómezSplicing and genetic susceptibility to cancer, Instituto de Biología y Genética Molecular (CSIC-UVa), Valladolid, Spain.
Valeria Velásquez-ZapataSplicing and genetic susceptibility to cancer, Instituto de Biología y Genética Molecular (CSIC-UVa), Valladolid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2756-2156
Alberto AcedoSplicing and genetic susceptibility to cancer, Instituto de Biología y Genética Molecular (CSIC-UVa), Valladolid, Spain.
David J SanzSplicing and genetic susceptibility to cancer, Instituto de Biología y Genética Molecular (CSIC-UVa), Valladolid, Spain.
Eladio A VelascoSplicing and genetic susceptibility to cancer, Instituto de Biología y Genética Molecular (CSIC-UVa), Valladolid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9682-5589
Instituto de Biomedicina y Genética Molecular de Valladolid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutation screening of the breast cancer genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 identifies a large fraction of variants of uncertain clinical significance (VUS) whose functional and clinical interpretations pose a challenge for genomic medicine. Likewise, an increasing amount of evidence indicates that genetic variants can have deleterious effects on pre-mRNA splicing. Our goal was to investigate the impact on splicing of a set of reported variants of BRCA2 exons 17 and 18 to assess their role in hereditary breast cancer and to identify critical regulatory elements that may constitute hotspots for spliceogenic variants. A splicing reporter minigene with BRCA2 exons 14 to-20 (MGBR2_ex14-20) was constructed in the pSAD vector. Fifty-two candidate variants were selected with splicing prediction programs, introduced in MGBR2_ex14-20 by site-directed mutagenesis and assayed in triplicate in MCF-7 cells. Wild type MGBR2_ex14-20 produced a stable transcript of the expected size (1,806 nucleotides) and structure (V1-[BRCA2_exons_14-20]-V2). Functional mapping by microdeletions revealed essential sequences for exon recognition on the 3' end of exon 17 (c.7944-7973) and the 5' end of exon 18 (c.7979-7988, c.7999-8013). Thirty out of the 52 selected variants induced anomalous splicing in minigene assays with >16 different aberrant transcripts, where exon skipping was the most common event. A wide range of splicing motifs were affected including the canonical splice sites (15 variants), novel alternative sites (3 variants), the polypyrimidine tract (3 variants) and enhancers/silencers (9 variants). According to the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), 20 variants could be classified as pathogenic (c.7806-2A>G, c.7806-1G>A, c.7806-1G>T, c.7806-1_7806-2dup, c.7976+1G>A, c.7977-3_7978del, c.7977-2A>T, c.7977-1G>T, c.7977-1G>C, c.8009C>A, c.8331+1G>T and c.8331+2T>C) or likely pathogenic (c.7806-9T>G, c.7976G>C, c.7976G>A, c.7977-7C>G, c.7985C>G, c.8023A>G, c.8035G>T and c.8331G>A), accounting for 30.8% of all pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants of exons 17-18 at the BRCA Share database. The remaining 8 variants (c.7975A>G, c.7977-6T>G, c.7988A>T, c.7992T>A, c.8007A>G, c.8009C>T, c.8009C>G, and c.8072C>T) induced partial splicing anomalies with important ratios of the full-length transcript (≥70%), so that they remained classified as VUS. Aberrant splicing is therefore especially prevalent in BRCA2 exons 17 and 18 due to the presence of active ESEs involved in exon recognition. Splicing functional assays with minigenes are a valuable strategy for the initial characterization of the splicing outcomes and the subsequent clinical interpretation of variants of any disease-gene, although these results should be checked, whenever possible, against patient RNA.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingMutationBase SequenceBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsDNA, NeoplasmExonsFemaleHumansMCF-7 CellsModels, GeneticMutagenesis, Site-DirectedOvarian NeoplasmsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, MessengerRNA PrecursorsBRCA2 ProteinDNA, NeoplasmRNA, MessengerRNA PrecursorsRNA Splice Sites

Identifiers

PMID28339459
PMCPMC5384790
OpenAlexW2601318190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.