ArticleGenome biology and evolution2017
Expressed Structurally Stable Inverted Duplicates in Mammalian Genomes as Functional Noncoding Elements.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- The origin of mirror repeats in the human genome.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Inverted duplicates are a type of repetitive DNA motifs consist of two copies of reverse complementary sequences separated by a spacer sequence. They can lead to genome instability and many may have no function, but some functional small RNAs are processed from hairpins transcribed from these elements. It is not clear whether the pervasive numbers of such elements in genomes, especially those of mammals, is the result of high generation rates of neutral or slightly deleterious duplication events or positive selection for functionality. To test the functionality of intergenic inverted duplicates without known functions, we used mirror duplicates, a type of repetitive DNA motifs with few reported functions and little potential to form hairpins when transcribed, as a nonfunctional control. We identified large numbers of inverted duplicates within intergenic regions of human and mouse genomes, as well as 19 other vertebrate genomes. Structure characterization of these inverted duplicates revealed higher proportion to form stable hairpins compared with converted mirror duplicates, suggesting that inverted duplicates may produce hairpin RNAs. Expression profiling across tissues demonstrated that 7.8% of human and 5.7% of mouse inverted duplicates were expressed even under strict criteria. We found that expressed inverted duplicates were more likely to be structurally stable than both unexpressed inverted duplicates and expressed converted mirror duplicates. By dating inverted duplicates in the vertebrate phylogenetic tree, we observed higher conservation of inverted duplicates than mirror duplicates. These observations support the notion that expressed inverted duplicates may be functional through forming hairpin RNAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.