Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28338403›Full record

Trial reportJournal of women's health (2002)2017

Personalized Mobile Health Intervention for Health and Weight Loss in Postpartum Women Receiving Women, Infants, and Children Benefit: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.

L Anne Gilmore, Monica C Klempel, Corby K Martin, Candice A Myers, Jeffrey H Burton, Elizabeth F Sutton, Leanne M Redman

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of women's health (2002), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 15 pooled it
19.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L Anne GilmorePennington Biomedical Research Center , Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Monica C KlempelPennington Biomedical Research Center , Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Corby K MartinPennington Biomedical Research Center , Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Candice A MyersPennington Biomedical Research Center , Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Jeffrey H BurtonPennington Biomedical Research Center , Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Elizabeth F SuttonPennington Biomedical Research Center , Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Leanne M RedmanPennington Biomedical Research Center , Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Pennington Biomedical Research Center · US

Funding

Tracking & Evaluation CoreU54GM104940 · NIGMS · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI Peter Todd Katzmarzyk · 2012 to 2026
$69.1M
Research BaseP30DK072476 · NIDDK · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI Peter Todd Katzmarzyk · 2005 to 2026
$26.5M
Neighborhood Moderating Effects on Intervention Response in Cardiovascular HealthF32HL123242 · NHLBI · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI MYERS, CANDICE ALICIA · 2014 to 2017
$142k
NHLBI NIH HHS F32 HL123242NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK072476NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrepregnancy maternal obesity and excessive weight gain during pregnancy lead to significant morbidities in mothers and their children. Mothers who never return to their prepregnancy weight begin subsequent pregnancies at a greater weight and have a larger propensity for excess gestational weight gain and postpartum weight retention.

methodsIn this pilot study, 40 postpartum women credentialed to receive postpartum women, infants, and children (WIC) service were randomized to usual care ("WIC Moms") or a personalized health intervention delivered via a SmartPhone ("E-Moms"). Assessments, including body weight, vital signs, circumferences, and body composition, were completed at week 0 (6-8 weeks postpartum), week 8, and week 16.

resultsResults are presented as change from week 0 at 16. As per the completers analysis, body weight change was not different between the groups (WIC Moms vs. E-Moms; 1.8 ± 0.9 vs. -0.1 ± 0.9 kg; p = 0.10), neither was the change in percent body fat (1.7 ± 0.6 vs. 0.1% ± 0.6%; p = 0.90) or waist/hip ratio (-0.01 ± 0.01 vs. -0.02 ± 0.01 cm; p = 0.60). However, due to notable variability in intervention adherence as the study progressed, participants were classified post hoc as having low (<40% adherence), medium (40%-70% adherence), or high adherence (>70% adherence). Participants with high intervention adherence (n = 5) had a significant reduction in body weight (-3.6 ± 1.6 vs. 1.8 ± 0.9 kg; p = 0.005) and percent body fat (-2.5 ± 1.0 vs. 1.7% ± 0.6%; p = 0.001) when compared to WIC Moms.

conclusionsOverall, the E-Moms intervention was not able to decrease postpartum weight retention in women receiving WIC benefits compared to usual care received through the current WIC program. However, there is some evidence to suggest improved adherence to the intervention would improve weight management.

Indexed as

Food AssistanceMothersPostpartum PeriodText MessagingWeight LossAdultChildFemaleHumansInfantLouisianaOutcome Assessment, Health CarePilot ProjectsPovertyPregnancyProspective Studiesapplicationmobile healthpostpartum womenSmartPhoneweight lossWIC

Identifiers

PMID28338403
PMCPMC5512465
OpenAlexW2600621102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.