Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28338128›Full record

ReviewChemical Society reviews2017

Metal-organic and covalent organic frameworks as single-site catalysts.

S M J Rogge, A Bavykina, J Hajek, H Garcia, A I Olivos-Suarez, A Sepúlveda-Escribano, A Vimont, G Clet, P Bazin, F Kapteijn and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical Society reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 128 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
128citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

128 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Single Cu Atom Sites on CoSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Charge Transfer and Recombination Pathways through Fullerene Guests in Porphyrin-Based MOFs.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Exploring New Bioorthogonal Catalysts: Scaffold Diversity in Catalysis for Chemical Biology.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

68 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

S M J RoggeCenter for Molecular Modeling, Ghent University, Technologiepark 903, 9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium. veronique.vanspeybroeck@ugent.be.
A Bavykina
J Hajek
H Garcia
A I Olivos-Suarez
A Sepúlveda-Escribano
A Vimont
G Clet
P Bazin
F Kapteijn
M Daturi
E V Ramos-Fernandez
F X Llabrés I Xamena
V Van Speybroeck
J Gascon

Funding

European Research Council 335746
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heterogeneous single-site catalysts consist of isolated, well-defined, active sites that are spatially separated in a given solid and, ideally, structurally identical. In this review, the potential of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and covalent organic frameworks (COFs) as platforms for the development of heterogeneous single-site catalysts is reviewed thoroughly. In the first part of this article, synthetic strategies and progress in the implementation of such sites in these two classes of materials are discussed. Because these solids are excellent playgrounds to allow a better understanding of catalytic functions, we highlight the most important recent advances in the modelling and spectroscopic characterization of single-site catalysts based on these materials. Finally, we discuss the potential of MOFs as materials in which several single-site catalytic functions can be combined within one framework along with their potential as powerful enzyme-mimicking materials. The review is wrapped up with our personal vision on future research directions.

Identifiers

PMID28338128
PMCPMC5708534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.