Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28337998›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2017

Circulating tumor cell status monitors the treatment responses in breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

Wen-Ting Yan, Xiang Cui, Qing Chen, Ya-Fei Li, You-Hong Cui, Yan Wang, Jun Jiang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Liquid biopsy-based early tumor and minimal residual disease detectionMedizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wen-Ting YanBreast Disease Center, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China.
Xiang CuiBreast Disease Center, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China.
Qing ChenInstitute of Toxicology, College of Preventive Medicine, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China.
Ya-Fei LiDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Preventive Medicine, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China.
You-Hong CuiInstitute of Pathology and Southwest Cancer Center, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University Chongqing 400038, China.
Yan WangInstitute of Pathology and Southwest Cancer Center, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University Chongqing 400038, China.
Jun JiangBreast Disease Center, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China.
Army Medical University · CNSouthwest Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whether circulating tumor cells (CTCs) can be used as an indicator of treatment response in breast cancer (BC) needs to be clarified. We addressed this issue by a meta-analysis. PubMed, EMBase and Cochrane library databases were searched in June 2016. Effect measures were estimated as pooled risk ratio (RR), odds ratio (OR) or mean difference by fixed- or random-effect models, according to heterogeneity of included studies. In total, 50 studies with 6712 patients were recruited. Overall analysis showed that there was a significant reduction of CTC-positive rate (RR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.61-0.76, P < 0.00001) after treatment. Subgroup analyses revealed that neoadjuvant treatment, adjuvant treatment, metastatic treatment or combination therapy could reduce the CTC-positive rate, but surgery could not; moreover, the reduction was only found in HER2+ or HER2- patients but not in the triple-negative ones. Reduction of CTC-positive rate was associated with lower probability of disease progression (OR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.33-0.89, P = 0.01) and longer overall survival period (mean difference = 11.61 months, 95% CI: 8.63-14.59, P < 0.00001) as well as longer progression-free survival period (mean difference = 5.07 months, 95% CI: 2.70-7.44, P < 0.0001). These results demonstrate that CTC status can serve as an indicator to monitor the effectiveness of treatments and guide subsequent therapies in BC.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGene ExpressionHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingOdds RatioPrognosisRisk FactorsSurvival AnalysisBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID28337998
PMCPMC5364512
OpenAlexW2599986806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.