Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28337996›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Protein interaction evolution from promiscuity to specificity with reduced flexibility in an increasingly complex network.

T Alhindi, Z Zhang, P Ruelens, H Coenen, H Degroote, N Iraci, K Geuten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cracking the Floral Quartet Code: How Do Multimers of MIKCInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Synergistic Combination ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Were Ancestral Proteins Less Specific?Molecular biology and evolution · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Exposing the distinctive modular behavior of β-strands and α-helices in folded proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

T AlhindiDepartment of Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Z ZhangDepartment of Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
P RuelensDepartment of Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
H CoenenDepartment of Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
H DegrooteDepartment of Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
N IraciDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
K GeutenDepartment of Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key question regarding protein evolution is how proteins adapt to the dynamic environment in which they function and how in turn their evolution shapes the protein interaction network. We used extant and resurrected ancestral plant MADS-domain transcription factors to understand how SEPALLATA3, a protein with hub and glue properties, evolved and takes part in network organization. Although the density of dimeric interactions was saturated in the network, many new interactions became mediated by SEPALLATA3 after a whole genome triplication event. By swapping SEPALLATA3 and its ancestors between dimeric networks of different ages, we found that the protein lost the capacity of promiscuous interaction and acquired specificity in evolution. This was accompanied with constraints on conformations through proline residue accumulation, which made the protein less flexible. SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE on the other hand (non-hub) was able to gain protein-protein interactions due to a C-terminal domain insertion, allowing for a larger interaction interface. These findings illustrate that protein interaction evolution occurs at the level of conformational dynamics, when the binding mechanism concerns an induced fit or conformational selection. Proteins can evolve towards increased specificity with reduced flexibility when the complexity of the protein interaction network requires specificity.

Indexed as

Protein Interaction Domains and MotifsProtein Interaction MapsAmino Acid SequenceEvolution, MolecularFungal ProteinsMolecular Dynamics SimulationMutationProtein BindingProtein ConformationProteinsSeptinsFungal ProteinsProteinsseptin 3Septins

Identifiers

PMID28337996
PMCPMC5364480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.