Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28337732›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2017

Medicare reimbursement and orthopedic surgery: past, present, and future.

R Carter Clement, Suneel B Bhat, Meredith E Clement, James C Krieg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Defining "completely better" status through patient-reported outcome measures after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Unplanned Emergency and Urgent Care Visits After Outpatient Orthopaedic Surgery.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Regulation of orthopaedic devices: Future implications for research and innovation.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Correlation between NDI, PROMIS and SF-12 in cervical spine surgery.The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

R Carter ClementRothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, 925 Chestnut St. Fifth Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Suneel B BhatRothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, 925 Chestnut St. Fifth Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Meredith E ClementRothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, 925 Chestnut St. Fifth Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
James C KriegRothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, 925 Chestnut St. Fifth Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA. James.Krieg@rothmaninstitute.com.

Funding

Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (NRSA)- T32T32AI007392 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Amy Lynn Corneli, Guido Ferrari · 1990 to 2026
$9.8M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007392
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis paper reviews the history and structure of Medicare reimbursement with a focus on aspects relevant to the field of orthopedic surgery. Namely, this includes Parts A and B, with particular attention paid to the origins of Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) and the physician fee schedule, respectively. We then review newer policies affecting orthopedic surgeons. RECENT

findingsRecent Medicare reforms relevant to our field include readmission penalties, the evolution of bundled payments including the mandatory Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) and Surgical Hip and Femur Fracture Treatment (SHFFT) programs, and the new mandatory Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) pay-for-performance program. Providers are facing an increasingly complex payment system and are required to assume growing levels of financial risk. Physicians and practices who prepare for these changes will likely fare best and may even benefit.

Indexed as

Bundled paymentsHealthcare reformMedicareMerit-based incentive payment system (MIPS)Orthopedic surgeryReimbursement

Identifiers

PMID28337732
PMCPMC5435637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.