ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2017
Current concepts of shared decision making in orthopedic surgery.
Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.
- Variation in quality of physician communication in prostate cancer consultations.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Article
- Digital informed consent for paediatric spinal surgery: a patient-centric evaluation of eConsent utilization.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2026Article
- Article
- Is There a Body Mass Index Threshold for Patients Undergoing Primary Total Knee Replacement-A Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- A comprehensive review of adult scoliosis: Advances in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management strategies.Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2025Review
- Patient Perceptions Regarding Clinical Follow-Up After Total Joint Arthroplasty.Arthroplasty today · 2025Article
- Surgical outcomes after reoperation of intra-articular proximal ulna fractures.JSES international · 2025Article
- Assessing Physician and Patient Agreement on Whether Patient Outcomes Captured in Clinical Progress Notes Reflect Treatment Success: Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2025Article
- Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2025Article
- The Impact of Experience Versus Decision Aids on Patient Preference Toward Virtual Care.Telemedicine reports · 2024Article
- Statistical Literacy in Hand and Upper-Extremity Patients.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2023Article
- Hipology 2023: Science, Philosophy, and Craft.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2023Review
- Research Trends of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Orthopedic Medical Practices: A Bibliometric and Visualized Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Moderators and Mediators of the Relationship of Shared Decision-Making and Satisfaction.Journal of patient experience · 2023Article
- Eliciting Activity Goals With a Self-Administered Survey Among Patients With Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2022Article
- Treatment decision-making process after an anterior cruciate ligament injury: patients', orthopaedic surgeons' and physiotherapists' perspectives.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
- Patient and Surgeon Risk-Taking Regarding Total Joint Arthroplasty.The Journal of arthroplasty · 2022Article
- When Do Patients Return to Driving After Outpatient Foot and Ankle Surgery?Hawai'i journal of health & social welfare · 2022Article
- Study protocol ROTATE-trial: anterior cruciate ligament rupture, the influence of a treatment algorithm and shared decision making on clinical outcome- a cluster randomized controlled trial.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
- "This is not negotiable. You need to do this…": A directed content analysis of decision making in rehabilitation after knee arthroplasty.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe Shared Decision Making (SDM) model, a collaborative decision making process between the physician and patient to make an informed clinical decision that enhances the chance of treatment success as defined by each patient's preferences and values, has become a new and promising tool in the healthcare process; however, minimal data exists on its application in the orthopedic surgical specialty. Increasing evidence has demonstrated that this once novel idea can be implemented successfully in the orthopedic setting to improve patient outcomes. RECENT
findingsSDM can be applied without significant increases in the office length. Patients report that a physician that takes the time to listen to them is among the most important factors in their care. When time was focused on the SDM process, there was a direct correlation between the time spent with a patient and patient satisfaction. Patients exposed to a decision aid prior to surgery gained a greater knowledge from baseline to make a higher quality decision that was consistent with their values. Involving family members preoperatively can help all patients adhere to postoperative regimens. Exposing patients to a decision aid can reduce expensive elective surgeries, in favor of non-operative management. Incorporating patient goals into the decision-making process has increased satisfaction, compliance, and outcomes. SDM is a two-way exchange of information that attempts to correct the inequality of power between the patient and physician. Decision-aids are helpful tools that facilitate the decision-making process. Treatment decisions are consistent with patient preferences and values when there may be no "best" therapy. A good patient-physician relationship is essential during the process to reduce decisional conflict and increase overall patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.