ArticleDrugs2017
Progression-Free Survival as a Surrogate for Overall Survival in Clinical Trials of Targeted Therapy in Advanced Solid Tumors.
Article in Drugs, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Outcomes and Effectiveness of CRLX101 for Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Thoracic cancer · 2023Pooled it
- ALK inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.PloS one · 2020Pooled it
- Anlotinib Monotherapy for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase III Trial (ALTER0703).The oncologist · 2021Trial
- CD36 inhibition enhances the anti-proliferative effects of PI3K inhibitors in PTEN-loss anti-HER2 resistant breast cancer cells.Cancer & metabolism · 2025Article
- Enrollment Success, Factors, and Prediction Models in Cancer Trials (2008-2019).JCO oncology practice · 2023Article
- Article
- Long-term outcomes of second-line versus later-line zanubrutinib treatment in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: An updated pooled analysis.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Exercise during CHemotherapy for Ovarian cancer (ECHO) trial: design and implementation of a randomised controlled trial.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Clinical Trial Endpoints in Metastatic Cancer: Using Individual Participant Data to Inform Future Trials Methodology.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2022Review
- Article
- Front-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and ALK fusion: a network meta-analysis.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2022Article
- Potential Life-Years Lost: The Impact of the Cancer Drug Regulatory and Funding Process in Canada.The oncologist · 2020Article
- Radiologic Modalities and Response Assessment Schemes for Clinical and Preclinical Oncology Imaging.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Review
- Progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint of overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.OncoTargets and therapy · 2018Article
- Monitoring for Response to Antineoplastic Drugs: The Potential of a Metabolomic Approach.Metabolites · 2017Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past 15 years, targeted therapy has revolutionized the systemic treatment of cancer. In parallel, there has been a growing debate on the choice of end points in clinical trials in oncology. This debate basically hinges on the choice between overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). PFS is advantageous because it is measured earlier than OS, requires a smaller sample size than OS to achieve the desired power, and is not influenced by cross-over. On the other hand, PFS is prone to measurement error and bias, and may not capture the entire treatment effect on the outcomes of most interest to patients with an incurable disease: a prolonged survival and improved quality of life. Therefore, how can we choose between two imperfect end points? The answer to this question would certainly be made easier if PFS could be demonstrated to be a valid surrogate for OS. The validation of a surrogate end point is best made using individual-patient data (IPD) from randomized trials, which allows for standardized assessments of the patient-level and the trial-level correlations between surrogate and final end points. Proper IPD meta-analytical evaluations for targeted agents have still been rare, and to our knowledge only three studies on this topic are currently available in the metastatic setting: one in breast cancer, one in colorectal cancer and one in lung cancer. Although these three studies suffer from limitations inherent to the availability of IPD and the design of the original clinical trials, they have not been able to validate PFS as surrogate for OS, because only modest correlations were found between these two end points, both at the patient and at the trial level. Even if properly conducted surrogate-endpoint evaluations have thus far been unsuccessful, these evaluations are a step in the right direction and can be expected to be applied on a much larger scale in the era of data sharing of clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.