Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28337439›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2017

A Brief Review of Non-invasive Monitoring of Respiratory Condition for Extubated Patients with or at Risk for Obstructive Sleep Apnea after Surgery.

Xuezheng Zhang, Mahmoud Attia Mohamed Kassem, Ying Zhou, Muhammad Shabsigh, Quanguang Wang, Xuzhong Xu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06060626 (Optimization of Sedation Protocol for Endoscopic Procedures Using Impedance Ventilation Monitor.), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06060626 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Optimization of Sedation Protocol for Endoscopic Procedures Using Impedance Ventilation Monitor.

TypeinterventionalSponsorCharles University, Czech RepublicRan2023 to 2025Enrolled50ConditionsSedation Complication, Ventilatory DepressionArmsSedation using only Propofol., Sedation using combination of Propofol and Fentanyl.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xuezheng ZhangAnesthesiology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China; Anesthesiology Department, Wexner Medical Center of Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Mahmoud Attia Mohamed KassemAnesthesiology Department, Wexner Medical Center of Ohio State University , Columbus, OH , USA.
Ying ZhouPulmonary Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou , China.
Muhammad ShabsighAnesthesiology Department, Wexner Medical Center of Ohio State University , Columbus, OH , USA.
Quanguang WangAnesthesiology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou , China.
Xuzhong XuAnesthesiology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou , China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University · CNThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USWenzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is one of the important risk factors contributing to postoperative airway complications. OSA alters the respiratory physiology and increases the sensitivity of muscle tone of the upper airway after surgery to residual anesthetic medication. In addition, the prevalence of OSA was reported to be much higher among surgical patients than the general population. Therefore, appropriate monitoring to detect early respiratory impairment in postoperative extubated patients with possible OSA is challenging. Based on the comprehensive clinical observation, several equipment have been used for monitoring the respiratory conditions of OSA patients after surgery, including the continuous pulse oximetry, capnography, photoplethysmography (PPG), and respiratory volume monitor (RVM). To date, there has been no consensus on the most suitable device as a recommended standard of care. In this review, we describe the advantages and disadvantages of some possible monitoring strategies under certain clinical conditions. According to the literature, the continuous pulse oximetry, with its high sensitivity, is still the most widely used device. It is also cost-effective and convenient to use but has low specificity and does not reflect ventilation. Capnography is the most widely used device for detection of hypoventilation, but it may not provide reliable data for extubated patients. Even normal capnography cannot exclude the existence of hypoxia. PPG shows the state of both ventilation and oxygenation, but its sensitivity needs further improvement. RVM provides real-time detection of hypoventilation, quantitative precise demonstration of respiratory rate, tidal volume, and MV for extubated patients, but no reflection of oxygenation. Altogether, the sole use of any of these devices is not ideal for monitoring of extubated patients with or at risk for OSA after surgery. However, we expect that the combined use of continuous pulse oximetry and RVM may be promising for these patients due to their complementary function, which need further study.

Indexed as

capnographymonitoringobstructive sleep apneaoximetryphotoplethysmographyrespiratory volume monitorsurgery

Identifiers

PMID28337439
PMCPMC5340767
OpenAlexW2592263954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.