ArticlePrzeglad gastroenterologiczny2017
Relationship between
Article in Przeglad gastroenterologiczny, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is Helicobacter pylori Infection Associated with Celiac Disease? A Meta-analysis.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2022Pooled it
- Infection with Helicobacter pylori and the age at onset of coeliac disease in the "HUNT4" survey.BMC research notes · 2025Article
- Epidemiological, clinical, and histological presentation of celiac disease in Northwest China.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Microscopic colitis: controversies in clinical symptoms and autoimmune comorbidities.Annals of medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- Helicobacter pylori prevalence and risk factors among children with celiac disease.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2019Article
- Coeliac disease: beyond genetic susceptibility and gluten. A narrative review.Annals of medicine · 2019Review
- Analysis of gastric and duodenal biopsy results in patients presenting with dyspepsia: a cross-sectional study in a middle eastern population.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWhether
aimTo compare the prevalence of CD autoantibody positivity and the levels of CD autoantibodies between MATERIAL AND
methodsThis study was prospectively designed and included 240 dyspeptic patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with gastric and duodenal biopsies. The patients were divided into two groups according to presence of
resultsThere were no significant differences in the serum levels of CD autoantibodies or IgA between the two groups. There were also no significant differences in the percentages of subjects with positive CD serologies or subjects with IgA deficiencies between the groups.
conclusions
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.