ReviewStem cells international2017
Emerging Perspectives in Scaffold for Tissue Engineering in Oral Surgery.
Review in Stem cells international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bioactive glass for periodontal regeneration: a systematic review.BMC oral health · 2023Pooled it
- Stromal-Derived Factor-1 (SDF-1/CXCL12) and Skin Wound Healing Research at the Intersection Between Regenerative Biology and Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Biomimetic Strategies for Bone Regeneration: Smart Scaffolds and Multiscale Cues.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Multifunctional peptide nanofiber coatings enhance bone regeneration on xenograft materials.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Bone Selective Remodeling of Xeno-Hybrid Grafts: A Case Series.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Comparison of the osteogenic effects of demineralized dentin matrix and acellular dentin matrix.Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2024Article
- Additive manufacturing of sustainable biomaterials for biomedical applications.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2023Review
- Efficacy of hyaluronic acid, absorbable collagen sponge, and their combination in minimizing bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (BRONJ) after dental extraction: a preliminary animal histomorphometric study.Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2022Article
- The effectiveness of hydroxyapatite-beta tricalcium phosphate incorporated into stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth for reconstruction of rat calvarial bone defects.Clinical oral investigations · 2022Article
- Biomaterials and biotechnology for periodontal tissue regeneration: Recent advances and perspectives.Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects · 2022Review
- Autologous blood derived cell therapy in maxillofacial bone graft surgery.Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2021Article
- Changes of Dentition State in Leukemic Patients during Chemotherapy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Oral Bone Tissue Regeneration: Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Secretome, and Biomaterials.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Influence of Materials Properties on Bio-Physical Features and Effectiveness of 3D-Scaffolds for Periodontal Regeneration.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Cyclodextrin-Based Supramolecular Complexes of Osteoinductive Agents for Dental Tissue Regeneration.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- Advanced Biomaterials and Techniques for Oral Tissue Engineering and Regeneration-A Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Biomimetic Aspects of Oral and Dentofacial Regeneration.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Which substances loaded onto collagen scaffolds influence oral tissue regeneration?-an overview of the last 15 years.Clinical oral investigations · 2020Review
- Bone Loss in Distal Radial Fractures Treated with A Composite Xenohybrid Bone Substitute: A Two Years Follow-Up Retrospective Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone regeneration is currently one of the most important and challenging tissue engineering approaches in regenerative medicine. Bone regeneration is a promising approach in dentistry and is considered an ideal clinical strategy in treating diseases, injuries, and defects of the maxillofacial region. Advances in tissue engineering have resulted in the development of innovative scaffold designs, complemented by the progress made in cell-based therapies. In vitro bone regeneration can be achieved by the combination of stem cells, scaffolds, and bioactive factors. The biomimetic approach to create an ideal bone substitute provides strategies for developing combined scaffolds composed of adult stem cells with mesenchymal phenotype and different organic biomaterials (such as collagen and hyaluronic acid derivatives) or inorganic biomaterials such as manufactured polymers (polyglycolic acid (PGA), polylactic acid (PLA), and polycaprolactone). This review focuses on different biomaterials currently used in dentistry as scaffolds for bone regeneration in treating bone defects or in surgical techniques, such as sinus lift, horizontal and vertical bone grafts, or socket preservation. Our review would be of particular interest to medical and surgical researchers at the interface of cell biology, materials science, and tissue engineering, as well as industry-related manufacturers and researchers in healthcare, prosthetics, and 3D printing, too.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.