Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28337012›Full record

ArticleBritish dental journal2017

Preparedness of undergraduate dental students in the United Kingdom: a national study.

K Ali, A Slade, E Kay, D Zahra, C Tredwin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in British dental journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Do Generic Skills Achieved During Undergraduate Dental Education Meet the Need in Clinical Practice?European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

K AliPlymouth University, Peninsula Dental School, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA.
A SladeInstitute of Applied Health Research, Birmingham, B15 2TT.
E KayPlymouth University, Peninsula Dental School, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA.
D ZahraPlymouth University, Peninsula Dental School, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA.
C TredwinPlymouth University, Peninsula Dental School, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims To evaluate the self-perceived preparedness of final year dental undergraduate students in the United Kingdom.Methods Dental undergraduate students in their final year were invited by email through the Dental Schools Council (DSC) to provide their responses to an online preparedness assessment scale. The data analysis was carried out using the RUMM2030 software which is specifically designed for Rasch analysis, a measurement model based on item response theory.Results Students felt adequately prepared to carry out simple clinical procedures and communication skills. However, low scores were reported on ability to assess orthodontic treatment needs, treatment planning, crowns, endodontics, research skills, referral for suspected oral cancer and raising concerns regarding inappropriate behaviour of colleagues.Conclusions The scale used in this study explored the self-perceived preparedness on a range of cognitive, clinical and behavioural attributes. The data show that the students felt prepared for the majority of the attributes expected from dentists. However, a number of areas were identified where students may benefit from further training and consolidation.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEducation, DentalSelf ConceptAdultFemaleHumansMaleSelf ReportStudents, DentalUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.