Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28336965›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Exploring Approaches for Detecting Protein Functional Similarity within an Orthology-based Framework.

Christian X Weichenberger, Antonia Palermo, Peter P Pramstaller, Francisco S Domingues

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christian X WeichenbergerCenter for Biomedicine, European Academy of Bozen/Bolzano (EURAC), (Affiliated to the University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany), Viale Druso 1, 39100, Bolzano, Italy. christian.weichenberger@eurac.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2176-0274
Antonia PalermoCenter for Biomedicine, European Academy of Bozen/Bolzano (EURAC), (Affiliated to the University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany), Viale Druso 1, 39100, Bolzano, Italy.
Peter P PramstallerCenter for Biomedicine, European Academy of Bozen/Bolzano (EURAC), (Affiliated to the University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany), Viale Druso 1, 39100, Bolzano, Italy.
Francisco S DominguesCenter for Biomedicine, European Academy of Bozen/Bolzano (EURAC), (Affiliated to the University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany), Viale Druso 1, 39100, Bolzano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein functional similarity based on gene ontology (GO) annotations serves as a powerful tool when comparing proteins on a functional level in applications such as protein-protein interaction prediction, gene prioritization, and disease gene discovery. Functional similarity (FS) is usually quantified by combining the GO hierarchy with an annotation corpus that links genes and gene products to GO terms. One large group of algorithms involves calculation of GO term semantic similarity (SS) between all the terms annotating the two proteins, followed by a second step, described as "mixing strategy", which involves combining the SS values to yield the final FS value. Due to the variability of protein annotation caused e.g. by annotation bias, this value cannot be reliably compared on an absolute scale. We therefore introduce a similarity z-score that takes into account the FS background distribution of each protein. For a selection of popular SS measures and mixing strategies we demonstrate moderate accuracy improvement when using z-scores in a benchmark that aims to separate orthologous cases from random gene pairs and discuss in this context the impact of annotation corpus choice. The approach has been implemented in Frela, a fast high-throughput public web server for protein FS calculation and interpretation.

Indexed as

Gene OntologyMolecular Sequence AnnotationComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID28336965
PMCPMC5428484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.