Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28336736›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Identifying possible reasons why female street sex workers have poor drug treatment outcomes: a qualitative study.

Nikki Jeal, John Macleod, Chris Salisbury, Katrina Turner

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Helping Women Suffering from Drug Addiction: Needs, Barriers, and Challenges.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nikki JealCentre for Academic Primary Care School of Social & Community Medicine Bristol, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
John MacleodCentre for Academic Primary Care School of Social & Community Medicine Bristol, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Chris SalisburyCentre for Academic Primary Care School of Social & Community Medicine Bristol, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Katrina TurnerCentre for Academic Primary Care School of Social & Community Medicine Bristol, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
University of Bristol · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health PDF-2011-04-038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo explore street sex workers (SSWs) views and experiences of drug treatment, in order to understand why this population tend to experience poor drug treatment outcomes.

designIn-depth interviews.

settingBristol, UK.

participants24 current and exited SSWs with current or previous experience of problematic use of heroin and/or crack cocaine.

findingsParticipants described how feeling unable to discuss their sex work in drug treatment groups undermined their engagement in the treatment process. They outlined how disclosure of sex work resulted in stigma from male and female service users as well as adverse interactions with male service users. Participants highlighted that non-disclosure meant they could not discuss unresolved trauma issues which were common and which emerged or increased when they reduced their drug use. As trauma experiences had usually involved men as perpetrators participants said it was not appropriate to discuss them in mixed treatment groups. SSWs in recovery described how persistent trauma-related symptoms still affected their lives many years after stopping sex work and drug use. Participants suggested SSW-only services and female staff as essential to effective care and highlighted that recent service changes were resulting in loss of trusted staff and SSW-only treatment services. This was reported to be reducing the likelihood of SSWs engaging in drug services, with the resultant loss of continuity of care and reduced time with staff acting as barriers to an effective therapeutic relationship.

conclusionsSSWs face many barriers to effective drug treatment. SSW-only treatment groups, continuity of care with treatment staff and contact with female staff, particularly individuals who have had similar lived experience, could improve the extent to which SSWs engage and benefit from drug treatment services. Service engagement and outcomes may also be improved by drug services that include identification and treatment of trauma-related symptoms.

Indexed as

Crack CocaineAdultCocaine-Related DisordersFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHeroin DependenceHumansMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSex WorkersTreatment FailureUnited KingdomCrack CocaineQUALITATIVE RESEARCHsex work

Identifiers

PMID28336736
PMCPMC5372151
OpenAlexW2602217962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.