Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28335800›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2017

A new method for in vitro feeding of Rhipicephalus australis (formerly Rhipicephalus microplus) larvae: a valuable tool for tick vaccine development.

Jos J A Trentelman, Jos A G M Kleuskens, Jos van de Crommert, Theo P M Schetters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Artificial Feeding of Hard Ticks Using Silicone Membranes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  2. FirstCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Metazoan Parasite Vaccines: Present Status and Future Prospects.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jos J A TrentelmanCenter for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, Netherlands. j.j.trentelman@amc.uva.nl.
Jos A G M KleuskensCenter for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jos van de CrommertAduro Biotech Europe, Kloosterstraat 9, 1101, RX, Boxmeer, Netherlands.
Theo P M SchettersProtActivity R&D, Sering 36, 5432, DD, Cuijk, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRhipicephalus microplus is a hard tick that has a major impact on cattle health in tropical and subtropical regions because it feeds on cattle and is implicated in the transmission of pathogens that cause diseases such as bovine anaplasmosis and babesiosis. Presently, acaricides are used to control tick infestation but this is becoming increasingly less effective due to the emergence of tick strains that are resistant to one or more classes of acaricides. Anti-tick vaccines are a promising alternative to control tick infestation in cattle. The life-cycle and host preference of R. microplus, however, makes vaccine research in cattle costly and would therefore greatly benefit from an in vitro screening system.

methodsTo this aim, a stacked 24-well in vitro feeding system was designed in which the blood meal was administered in a chamber on top of the compartment containing the ticks, exploiting their anti-gravitational tendency. Both compartments were separated by a special feeding membrane, which was made by applying a silicone mixture to a gold beater's skin (baudruche membrane) with a paint roller to create a slightly uneven surface of 17-40 μm variable thickness. To further stimulate feeding, the membrane was treated with bovine hair extract and the unit was placed at 37 °C with 90% RH and 5% CO

resultsUsing this set-up with Rhipicephalus australis (formerly Rhipicephalus microplus), a larval engorgement rate of up to 71% could be achieved. The larvae could successfully feed on blood, but also on serum. The latter allows easy screening of the effect of sera that are raised against tick proteins on feeding. As an example, serum from cattle that were vaccinated with the Bm86 midgut protein of R. microplus significantly reduced larval engorgement rates by 42%.

conclusionThe in vitro feeding system's high throughput design and its ability to measure statistically significant anti-tick effects in sera from immunized cattle enables screening of multiple vaccine candidates in a cost-effective manner.

Indexed as

Feeding MethodsAnimal FeedAnimalsEntomologyLarvaRhipicephalusTemperatureArtificial tick feedingIn vitro screeningLarvaeRhipicephalus australisRhipicephalus microplus

Identifiers

PMID28335800
PMCPMC5364646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.