Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28335792›Full record

SynthesisBMC medicine2017

Can incontinence be cured? A systematic review of cure rates.

Rob Riemsma, Suzanne Hagen, Ruth Kirschner-Hermanns, Christine Norton, Helle Wijk, Karl-Erik Andersson, Christopher Chapple, Julian Spinks, Adrian Wagg, Edward Hutt and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04117126 (Efficacy of Prompted Voiding Therapy for Reverse the Urinary Incontinence Status in Elderly Patients Hospitalized in a Functional Recovery Ward.), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04117126 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Prompted Voiding Therapy for Reverse the Urinary Incontinence Status in Elderly Patients Hospitalized in a Functional Recovery Ward.

TypeinterventionalSponsorGuadarrama HospitalRan2019 to 2023Enrolled158ConditionsUrinary IncontinenceArmsPrompted voiding
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Diagnosis and management of urinary incontinence in females.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Holistically sustainable continence care: A working definition, the case of single-used absorbent hygiene products (AHPs) and the need for ecosystems thinking.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2024
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Rob RiemsmaKleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, Unit 6, Escrick Business Park, Riccall Road, Escrick, York, YO19 6FD, UK. rob@systematic-reviews.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8892-0861
Suzanne HagenNMAHP Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Ruth Kirschner-HermannsNeuro-Urologie, Clinic of Urology, University Clinic Friedrich-Wilhelms-University Bonn and Neurologic Rehabilitation Center Godeshoehe, Bonn, Germany.
Christine NortonFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery King's College London, London, UK.
Helle WijkCentre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), Institution for Health and Care Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Karl-Erik AnderssonClinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Christopher ChappleDepartment of Urology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Julian SpinksCourt View Surgery, Strood, UK.
Adrian WaggDivision of Geriatric Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Edward HuttMedica Market Access Ltd, Tonbridge, UK.
Kate MissoKleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, Unit 6, Escrick Business Park, Riccall Road, Escrick, York, YO19 6FD, UK.
Sohan DeshpandeKleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, Unit 6, Escrick Business Park, Riccall Road, Escrick, York, YO19 6FD, UK.
Jos KleijnenKleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, Unit 6, Escrick Business Park, Riccall Road, Escrick, York, YO19 6FD, UK.
Ian MilsomDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Gothenburg · SEAarhus University · DKGlasgow Caledonian University · GBKing's College London · GBMaastricht University · NLRoyal Hallamshire Hospital · GBTonbridge School · GBUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

Chief Scientist Office NMAHP2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncontinence constitutes a major health problem affecting millions of people worldwide. The present study aims to assess cure rates from treating urinary (UI) or fecal incontinence (FI) and the number of people who may remain dependent on containment strategies.

methodsMedline, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), CINAHL, and PEDro were searched from January 2005 to June 2015. Supplementary searches included conference abstracts and trials registers (2013-2015). Included studies had patients ≥ 18 years with UI or FI, reported treatment cure or success rates, had ≥ 50 patients treated with any intervention recognized in international guideline algorithms, a follow-up ≥ 3 months, and were published from 2005 onwards. Title and abstract screening, full paper screening, data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Disagreements were resolved through discussion or referral to a third reviewer where necessary. A narrative summary of included studies is presented.

resultsMost evidence was found for UI: Surgical interventions for stress UI showed a median cure rate of 82.3% (interquartile range (IQR), 72-89.5%); people with urgency UI were mostly treated using medications (median cure rate for antimuscarinics = 49%; IQR, 35.6-58%). Pelvic floor muscle training and bulking agents showed lower cure rates for UI. Sacral neuromodulation for FI had a median cure rate of 38.6% (IQR, 35.6-40.6%).

conclusionsMany individuals were not cured and hence may continue to rely on containment. No studies were found assessing success of containment strategies. There was a lack of data in the disabled and in those with neurological diseases, in the elderly and those with cognitive impairment. Surgical interventions were effective for stress UI. Other interventions for UI and FI showed lower cure rates. Many individuals are likely to be reliant on containment strategies. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42015023763 .

Indexed as

Remission InductionAgedAged, 80 and overExercise TherapyFecal IncontinenceFemaleHumansMalePelvic FloorUrinary IncontinenceCure ratesIncontinenceSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID28335792
PMCPMC5364653
OpenAlexW2598760709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.