Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28335751›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2017

Exploring community participation in project design: application of the community conversation approach to improve maternal and newborn health in Zambia.

Wilbroad Mutale, Chisala Masoso, Bisalom Mwanza, Cindy Chirwa, Lasidah Mwaba, Zumbe Siwale, Barbara Lamisa, Dennis Musatwe, Roma Chilengi

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wilbroad MutaleDepartment of Public Health, University of Zambia School of Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia. wmutale@yahoo.com.
Chisala MasosoCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.
Bisalom MwanzaDepartment of Public Health, University of Zambia School of Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia.
Cindy ChirwaCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.
Lasidah MwabaCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.
Zumbe SiwaleCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.
Barbara LamisaCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.
Dennis MusatweCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.
Roma ChilengiCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) has adopted an approach entitled Community Conversation (CC) to improve community engagement in addressing health challenges. CCs are based on Paulo Freire's transformative communication approach, in which communities pose problems and critically examine their everyday life experiences through discussion. We adopted this approach to engage communities in maternal and newborn health discussions in three rural districts of Zambia, with the aim of developing community-generated interventions.

methodsSixty (60) CCs were held in three target districts, covering a total of 20 health facilities. Communities were purposively selected in each district to capture a range of rural and peri-urban areas at varying distances from health facilities. Conversations were held four times in each community between May and September 2014. All conversations were digitally recorded and later transcribed. NVivo version 10 was used for data analysis. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The major barriers to accessing maternal health services included geography, limited infrastructure, lack of knowledge, shortage of human resources and essential commodities, and insufficient involvement of male partners. From the demand side, a lack of information and misconceptions, and, from the supply side, inadequately trained health workers with poor attitudes, negatively affected access to maternal health services in target districts either directly or indirectly. At least 17 of 20 communities suggested solutions to these challenges, including targeted community sensitisation on the importance of safe motherhood, family planning and prevention of teenage pregnancy. Community members and key stakeholders committed time and resources to address these challenges with minimal external support.

conclusionWe successfully applied the CC approach to explore maternal health challenges in three rural districts of Zambia. CCs functioned as an advocacy platform to facilitate direct engagement with key decision makers within the community and to align priorities while incorporating community views. There was a general lack of knowledge about safe motherhood and family planning in all three districts. However, other problems were unique to health facilities, demonstrating the need for tailored interventions.

Indexed as

CommunicationCommunity ParticipationHealth Services AccessibilityAdolescentAdultCommunity Health PlanningFacility Design and ConstructionFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansInfant, NewbornInterviews as TopicMaleMaternal-Child Health ServicesMedically Underserved AreaPregnancyAntenatal (ANC)Community conversation (CC)ContraceptivesFamily planningMaternal healthNewborn health

Identifiers

PMID28335751
PMCPMC5364664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.