Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28335421›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2017

PAMAM Dendrimers Cross the Blood-Brain Barrier When Administered through the Carotid Artery in C57BL/6J Mice.

Bhairavi Srinageshwar, Sarah Peruzzaro, Melissa Andrews, Kayla Johnson, Allison Hietpas, Brittany Clark, Crystal McGuire, Eric Petersen, Jordyn Kippe, Andrew Stewart and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Smart nanoparticles for cancer therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. A Glimpse into Dendrimers Integration in Cancer Imaging and Theranostics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Bhairavi SrinageshwarField Neurosciences Institute laboratory for Restorative Neurology at Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859, USA. srina1b@cmich.edu.
Sarah PeruzzaroField Neurosciences Institute laboratory for Restorative Neurology at Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859, USA. peruz1st@cmich.edu.
Melissa AndrewsField Neurosciences Institute laboratory for Restorative Neurology at Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859, USA. andre2mm@cmich.edu.
Kayla JohnsonDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859, USA. johns52k@cmich.edu.
Allison HietpasDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859, USA. hietp1ar@cmich.edu.
Brittany ClarkDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859, USA. clark6bm@cmich.edu.
Crystal McGuireField Neurosciences Institute laboratory for Restorative Neurology at Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859, USA. mcgui4c@cmich.edu.
Eric PetersenProgram in Neuroscience, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859, USA. peter1ed@cmich.edu.
Jordyn KippeField Neurosciences Institute laboratory for Restorative Neurology at Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859, USA. kippe1jm@cmich.edu.
Andrew StewartField Neurosciences Institute laboratory for Restorative Neurology at Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859, USA. stewa2an@cmich.edu.
Olivia LossiaField Neurosciences Institute laboratory for Restorative Neurology at Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859, USA. lossi1ov@cmich.edu.
Abeer Al-GharaibehField Neurosciences Institute laboratory for Restorative Neurology at Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859, USA. algha2a@cmich.edu.
Aaron AntcliffField Neurosciences Institute laboratory for Restorative Neurology at Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859, USA. antcl1ak@cmich.edu.
Rebecca CulverField Neurosciences Institute laboratory for Restorative Neurology at Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859, USA. culve1rl@cmich.edu.
Douglas SwansonDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859, USA. swans1d@cmich.edu.
Gary DunbarField Neurosciences Institute laboratory for Restorative Neurology at Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859, USA. dunba1g@cmich.edu.
Ajit SharmaDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859, USA. sharm1a@cmich.edu.
Julien RossignolField Neurosciences Institute laboratory for Restorative Neurology at Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859, USA. rossi1j@cmich.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug delivery into the central nervous system (CNS) is challenging due to the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and drug delivery into the brain overcoming the BBB can be achieved using nanoparticles such as dendrimers. The conventional cationic dendrimers used are highly toxic. Therefore, the present study investigates the role of novel mixed surface dendrimers, which have potentially less toxicity and can cross the BBB when administered through the carotid artery in mice. In vitro experiments investigated the uptake of amine dendrimers (G1-NH₂ and G4-NH₂) and novel dendrimers (G1-90/10 and G4-90/10) by primary cortical cultures. In vivo experiments involved transplantation of G4-90/10 into mice through (1) invasive intracranial injections into the striatum; and (2) less invasive carotid injections. The animals were sacrificed 24-h and 1-week post-transplantations and their brains were analyzed. In vivo experiments proved that the G4-90/10 can cross the BBB when injected through the carotid artery and localize within neurons and glial cells. The dendrimers were found to migrate through the corpus callosum 1-week post intracranial injection. Immunohistochemistry showed that the migrating cells are the dendrimer-infected glial cells. Overall, our results suggest that poly-amidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers may be used as a minimally invasive means to deliver biomolecules for treating neurological diseases or disorders.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierCarotid ArteriesCells, CulturedDendrimersInjections, Intra-ArterialMiceMice, Inbred C57BLDendrimersPAMAM Starburstbio-distribution and uptakeblood–brain barrierneurodegenerative diseasesnon-invasive deliveryPAMAM dendrimer nanoparticle

Identifiers

PMID28335421
PMCPMC5372641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.