ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2017
DNA Sequencing Sensors: An Overview.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Methodological Appraisal of Literature Concerning the Analysis of Genetic Variants or Protein Levels of Complement Components on Susceptibility to Infection by Trypanosomatids: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Pooled it
- CCDC137: A key hub for RNA and epigenetic regulation in cancer research (Review).International journal of oncology · 2026Review
- Next generation sequencing and beyond: a review of genomic sequencing methods.Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Article
- Sequencing and Optical Genome Mapping for the Adventurous Chemist.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2024Review
- From Tradition to Innovation: Diverse Molecular Techniques in the Fight Against Infectious Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Best practices for germline variant and DNA methylation analysis of second- and third-generation sequencing data.Human genomics · 2024Review
- A Review of Transcriptomics and Metabolomics in Plant Quality and Environmental Response: From Bibliometric Analysis to Science Mapping and Future Trends.Metabolites · 2024Review
- Long-Read Sequencing andBiology · 2024Article
- Can long-read sequencing tackle the barriers, which the next-generation could not? A review.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2024Review
- Wafer-Scale Graphene Field-Effect Transistor Biosensor Arrays with Monolithic CMOS Readout.ACS applied electronic materials · 2023Article
- Application of next-generation sequencing to identify different pathogens.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- DNA Sequencing Methods: From Past to Present.The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2022Article
- Accurate reconstruction of viral genomes in human cells from short reads using iterative refinement.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Whole Genome Sequencing Contributions and Challenges in Disease Reduction Focused on Malaria.Biology · 2022Review
- The medical cyborg concept.EMBnet.journal · 2022Article
- Basecalling Using Joint Raw and Event Nanopore Data Sequence-to-Sequence Processing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Artificial Intelligence, Healthcare, Clinical Genomics, and Pharmacogenomics Approaches in Precision Medicine.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
- Molecular Genetic Techniques in Biomarker Analysis Relevant for Drugs Centrally Approved in Europe.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2022Review
- Third-Generation Sequencing: The Spearhead towards the Radical Transformation of Modern Genomics.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Cutaneous Melanoma Classification: The Importance of High-Throughput Genomic Technologies.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The first sequencing of a complete genome was published forty years ago by the double Nobel Prize in Chemistry winner Frederick Sanger. That corresponded to the small sized genome of a bacteriophage, but since then there have been many complex organisms whose DNA have been sequenced. This was possible thanks to continuous advances in the fields of biochemistry and molecular genetics, but also in other areas such as nanotechnology and computing. Nowadays, sequencing sensors based on genetic material have little to do with those used by Sanger. The emergence of mass sequencing sensors, or new generation sequencing (NGS) meant a quantitative leap both in the volume of genetic material that was able to be sequenced in each trial, as well as in the time per run and its cost. One can envisage that incoming technologies, already known as fourth generation sequencing, will continue to cheapen the trials by increasing DNA reading lengths in each run. All of this would be impossible without sensors and detection systems becoming smaller and more precise. This article provides a comprehensive overview on sensors for DNA sequencing developed within the last 40 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.