Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28334697›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2016

Constraint-based stoichiometric modelling from single organisms to microbial communities.

Willi Gottstein, Brett G Olivier, Frank J Bruggeman, Bas Teusink

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The proteome is a terminal electron acceptor.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Deciphering and designing microbial communities by genome-scale metabolic modelling.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  9. Genome-scale model ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Microbiome modeling: a beginner's guide.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Willi GottsteinSystems Bioinformatics, Amsterdam Institute for Molecules, Medicines and Systems, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1087, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6502-1393
Brett G OlivierSystems Bioinformatics, Amsterdam Institute for Molecules, Medicines and Systems, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1087, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Frank J BruggemanSystems Bioinformatics, Amsterdam Institute for Molecules, Medicines and Systems, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1087, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bas TeusinkSystems Bioinformatics, Amsterdam Institute for Molecules, Medicines and Systems, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1087, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands b.teusink@vu.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial communities are ubiquitously found in Nature and have direct implications for the environment, human health and biotechnology. The species composition and overall function of microbial communities are largely shaped by metabolic interactions such as competition for resources and cross-feeding. Although considerable scientific progress has been made towards mapping and modelling species-level metabolism, elucidating the metabolic exchanges between microorganisms and steering the community dynamics remain an enormous scientific challenge. In view of the complexity, computational models of microbial communities are essential to obtain systems-level understanding of ecosystem functioning. This review discusses the applications and limitations of constraint-based stoichiometric modelling tools, and in particular flux balance analysis (FBA). We explain this approach from first principles and identify the challenges one faces when extending it to communities, and discuss the approaches used in the field in view of these challenges. We distinguish between steady-state and dynamic FBA approaches extended to communities. We conclude that much progress has been made, but many of the challenges are still open.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalMicrobial Consortiacommunity flux balance analysisderivation of flux balance analysisgenome-scale stoichiometric modelsgrowth strategiesmetabolic interactionsmicrobial communities

Identifiers

PMID28334697
PMCPMC5134014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.