Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28334559›Full record

ArticleJoint Commission journal on quality and patient safety2016

Design and Hospitalwide Implementation of a Standardized Discharge Summary in an Electronic Health Record.

Shannon M Dean, Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi, Joel Buchanan, Brad Ehlenfeldt, Amy J H Kind

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A method to automate the discharge summary hospital course for neurology patients.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shannon M DeanAssociate Professor of Pediatrics, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health; Chief Medical Information Officer for UW Health, Madison. Electronic address: SDean@uwhealth.org.
Andrea Gilmore-BykovskyiFormerly Advanced Fellow, William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Affairs Hospital, Madison; Assistant Professor, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Nursing.
Joel BuchananProfessor of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine; Medical Director, Information Technology Services Strategic Projects, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health.
Brad EhlenfeldtUW Health.
Amy J H KindAssociate Professor of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health; Associate Director-Clinical, Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center, William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital.

Funding

INSTITUTIONAL CTSA (UW-MADISON): CLINICAL TRIALSUL1RR025011 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2007 to 2011
$29.5M
The Hospital Discharge Summary's Impact on Sub-Acute Care Patient OutcomesK23AG034551 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KIND, AMY J. · 2010 to 2012
$556k
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025011NIA NIH HHS K23 AG034551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe hospital discharge summary is the primary method used to communicate a patient's plan of care to the next provider(s). Despite the existence of regulations and guidelines outlining the optimal content for the discharge summary and its importance in facilitating an effective transition to posthospital care, incomplete discharge summaries remain a common problem that may contribute to poor posthospital outcomes. Electronic health records (EHRs) are regularly used as a platform on which standardization of content and format can be implemented. The feasibility of designing and implementing a standardized discharge summary hospitalwide using an EHR was examined-to the authors' knowledge, for the first time.

methodsThis large-scale project at the University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics was led by a task force that had been assembled to develop best practices for EHR notes. The evidence-based Replicating Effective Programs (REP) model was employed to guide the development and implementation during the project. REP outlines four stages in clinical health service intervention implementation: preconditions, preimplementation, implementation, and maintenance.

resultsAt 18 months postimplementation, 90% of all hospital discharge summaries were written using the standardized format. Hospital providers found the template helpful and easy to use, and recipient providers perceived an improvement in the quality of discharge summaries compared to those previously sent from the hospital.

conclusionDischarge summaries can be standardized and implemented hospitalwide with both author and recipient provider satisfaction, particularly if evidence-based implementation strategies are employed. The use of EHR tools to guide clinicians in writing comprehensive discharge summaries holds promise in improving the existing deficits in communication at transitions of care.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsQuality ImprovementAcademic Medical CentersAdvisory CommitteesEvidence-Based PracticeHealth Services ResearchHumansPatient Discharge SummariesWisconsin

Identifiers

PMID28334559
PMCPMC5367268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.