Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28334425›Full record

ReviewCancer2017

Risk-reducing salpingectomy: Let us be opportunistic.

Kara C Long Roche, Nadeem R Abu-Rustum, Mlica Nourmoussavi, Oliver Zivanovic

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03171467 (Salpingectomy in Women Undergoing Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03171467 nacompletednot on this map

Salpingectomy in Women Undergoing Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SaLCHE): A Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical University of GrazRan2016 to 2018Enrolled100ConditionsProphylactic Salpingectomy, Opportunistic Salpingectomy, Laparoscopic CholecystectomyArmsSalpingectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy versus hysterectomy alone.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Global epidemiology of epithelial ovarian cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Before it catches the eye….Annals of translational medicine · 2019
    Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Trends of Opportunistic Salpingectomy.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kara C Long RocheGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Nadeem R Abu-RustumGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Mlica NourmoussaviGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Oliver ZivanovicGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because there is no screening test for ovarian cancer, effective prevention strategies may be the best way to reduce the mortality of this most lethal gynecologic malignancy. Increasing evidence supports the hypothesis that the fallopian tube is the site of origin for the vast majority of high-grade serous carcinomas. Our growing understanding of the pathogenesis of this disease offers a rare opportunity to explore new preventive measures, such as bilateral salpingectomy, which may provide great benefit without compromising ovarian function. If the tubal paradigm is accurate, then the impact of bilateral salpingectomy could extend to BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, high-risk noncarriers, and average-risk women. The authors present a review of the literature on the role of risk-reducing salpingectomy in all women and in high-risk groups, with a focus on morbidity, ovarian function, potential clinical applicability, and epidemiological considerations. Cancer 2017;123:1714-1720. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2Genital Diseases, FemaleHereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer SyndromeHumansMenopause, PrematureMutationNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialOvarian NeoplasmsProphylactic Surgical ProceduresRisk AssessmentSalpingectomyfallopian tubeshigh-grade serous carcinomaovarian cancerovarian functionsalpingectomy

Identifiers

PMID28334425
PMCPMC5419880
OpenAlexW2601715323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.